Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Fw rule set question |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:09:59 -0700 |
It actually looks like it's going from WAN to LAN, per his comment "is allowed from the internet to the internal network". This is a debate I have seen many times in the security/network arena. From a security perspective, I would say ICMP (and enumeration) present risk (risk to your internal network, your security posture, etc.). Having said that, from a network support/engineer perspective, troubleshooting connectivity issues is easier with certain ICMP types enabled. The question is really, is the value of having unreachable and time exceeded enabled through the firewall worth the risk? That's something you have to weigh based on the sensitivity and value of the resources you're protecting, and the likelihood of the risk being exploited, etc. For example, I don't think very many security or network support people would want the server that stores their bank account information being enumerated via ICMP or any other protocol. Since data/information could be tunneled through ICMP regardless of it's type, I would be reluctant to give a generic answer of "it's fine" without knowing what the firewall is protecting/positioned in front of. Justin.Ross Security Engineer -----Original Message----- From: listbounce@securityfocus.com [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com] On Behalf Of Craig Van Tassle Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 10:36 AM To: security basics Subject: Re: Fw rule set question They are not that big of an issue. What way are these going? Are they going form the LAN to the WAN. Over all Source Quench is needed for TCP flow control. Unreachable and time execeeded are also fine. Unreachable, well that should be obvious. Time Exceeded is usually used for trace routes and finding a routing loop. The only possible risk I can see from these ICMP's is that it may allow for internal host enumeration, other then that the risk is minimal with ICMP. I recommend that you look at RFC 792, http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc792.html That will help you understand ICMP a lot better and what it's uses are for. Juan B wrote:
hi,
I am evaluating a Fw rule set.
I see that source quench,icmp unreacheble and time execeeded (all
icmp) is allowed from the internet to the internal network. this is a
cisco pix. is it a requirmnet that those rules will be opened? what
happened if I disbale them? is there a security risk here? I dont
rememmber seeing those rules opened in any fw I saw..
thanks a lot !
Juan
______________________________________________________________________
______________
Got a little couch potato?
Check out fun summer activities for kids.
http://search.yahoo.com/search?fr=oni_on_mail&p=summer+activities+for+
kids&cs=bz
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fw rule set question, Craig Van Tassle |
|---|---|
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fw rule set question, Craig Van Tassle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |