Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: FAX a virus |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:30:26 -0500 |
You guys have completely missed Alcides question, and are refusing to acknowledge the point. He extracts info from faxes and processes the extracted info, he does not process faxes. -----Original Message----- From: listbounce@securityfocus.com [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com] On Behalf Of Craig Wright Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 8:24 PM To: Daniel Anderson Cc: Nick Duda; anonymous@email.com; security-basics@securityfocus.com; Bob Radvanovsky Subject: RE: FAX a virus Sorry Daniel, it does not suffice to state that Fax is digital therefore it must be vulnerable. Please do bring up another case. I am happy to analyse it. As I have stated, scientific process required that you prove a condition. I will happily shoot down any of the theretical conditions that are being suggested however. You can not send digital data through a fax line (computer to computer or not) in order to cause a buffer overflow. Error correction is adaequate to send textual information with a moderate degree of success and few errors. However, the level of white noise rejection is too high to send anything that can result in a buffer overflow. Fuzzing has already been brought up and shown to be the wrong approach. Tiff libray attachs all reqiure direct manipulation of the saved digital data. When sending an image, the scan is converted and reprocessed. So this can not work. Please !!! Prove me wrong ! You state that I am - prove it! Supply some evidence other than stating I am ranting and proive your accusations. I have never stated I am nice and I know I am not diplomatic, but prove me wrong. Craig -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Anderson [mailto:dtndan@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, 7 March 2007 12:18 PM To: Craig Wright Cc: Nick Duda; anonymous@email.com; security-basics@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: FAX a virus Nick, I wouldn't waste my time. Craig seems to want to hear himself rant today. You can tell because he is screaming about FUD, making cracks about who is "professional" and who is not, bringing in lots of nonrelated info, and giving us unnecessary background info, but not useful info like current ITU standards, T.30, T.38, etc. Suffice it to say that FAX has grown up into a digital data protocol, and there are various potential areas that could be explored once you get your head around the fact that a FAX no longer has to involve paper any more and, if it is ever analog, is only analog for the physical bit between the modems (which really doesn't matter one way or the other). While the OP suggested a situation that could not really occur (inject macro type virus over FAX) a variety of buffer overflows (driver, tiff libraries, PDF libraries, etc), etc should be analyzed and not merely declared as "FUD, FUD, FUD". Dan On 3/6/07, Craig Wright <cwright@bdosyd.com.au> wrote: No, the attach is not against the fax. It is not via the fax comms. It is simply an attack against a cisco over IP that you are assuming. The cisco can not be attacked in the manner you suggest. Please feel free to prove me wrong. Craig -----Original Message----- From: Nick Duda [mailto:nduda@VistaPrint.com] Sent: Wednesday, 7 March 2007 4:18 AM To: Craig Wright; anonymous@email.com <mailto:anonymous@email.com> ; security-basics@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: FAX a virus Fax machine + Cisco ATA + IP + CallManager = Fax machine Fax machine can = software Fax can be IP/Software based....a possible vector for an attack. ________________________________ From: listbounce@securityfocus.com on behalf of Craig Wright Sent: Fri 3/2/2007 11:51 PM To: anonymous@email.com; security-basics@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: FAX a virus FAX! There is NO UDP/IP port. NO TCP/IP port. No IP Address. FAX is not IP based. Not theory at all. FUD! Craig ________________________________ From: listbounce@securityfocus.com <mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com> on behalf of anonymous@email.com Sent: Fri 2/03/2007 6:31 AM To: security-basics@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: FAX a virus Perhaps something along these lines: Dependant on resolving the phone number to an IP address of course, but once that information is found either through social engineering or voip probes you could use nmap to find which port is working as the fax reciever then attempt to determine the type of fax machine and from there if you knew assembly could *possibly (if the fax machine allowed remote firmware upgrades) rewrite the firmware of the machine itself but a more practical method would be to temporarily store information in the buffer of the fax machine (this would cause garbage to be printed for one thing which would be a big annoyance). And from what you have described from your setup the software itself may be vulnerable to memory bounds checks etc. You would want to research the software using lists such as this if you are truely afraid of vulnerabilities in your fax application. Again this is more theoretical then practical but you get the idea. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- This list is sponsored by: BigFix If your IT fails, you're out of business - or worse. Arm your enterprise with BigFix, the single converged IT security and operations engine. BigFix enables continuous discovery, assessment, remediation, and enforcement for complex and distributed IT environments in real-time from a single console. Think what's next. Think BigFix. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;82309979;15562032;o?http://www.bigfix.com/ ITNext/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --- Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation in respect of matters arising within those States and Territories of Australia where such legislation exists. DISCLAIMER The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use or disclose the information. If you have received this email in error, please inform us promptly by reply email or by telephoning +61 2 9286 5555. Please delete the email and destroy any printed copy. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. You may not rely on this message as advice unless it has been electronically signed by a Partner of BDO or it is subsequently confirmed by letter or fax signed by a Partner of BDO. BDO accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments due to viruses, interference, interception, corruption or unauthorised access. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation in respect of matters arising within those States and Territories of Australia where such legislation exists. DISCLAIMER The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use or disclose the information. If you have received this email in error, please inform us promptly by reply email or by telephoning +61 2 9286 5555. Please delete the email and destroy any printed copy. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. You may not rely on this message as advice unless it has been electronically signed by a Partner of BDO or it is subsequently confirmed by letter or fax signed by a Partner of BDO. BDO accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments due to viruses, interference, interception, corruption or unauthorised access. Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation in respect of matters arising within those States and Territories of Australia where such legislation exists. DISCLAIMER The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use or disclose the information. If you have received this email in error, please inform us promptly by reply email or by telephoning +61 2 9286 5555. Please delete the email and destroy any printed copy. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. You may not rely on this message as advice unless it has been electronically signed by a Partner of BDO or it is subsequently confirmed by letter or fax signed by a Partner of BDO. BDO accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments due to viruses, interference, interception, corruption or unauthorised access.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: FUD - was FAX a virus, Peter Denyer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RDP Security, WALI |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: FAX a virus, Craig Wright |
| Next by Thread: | RE: FAX a virus, Craig Wright |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |