Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Highlighting weak password dangers |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:40:01 -0800 (PST) |
Don't use something that actually tries to login to the account, that's counter productive. Use something like John the Ripper that uses the SAM database. Use a dictionary or hybrid attack and fill your custom dictionary with all the passwords that aren't allowed based on your password policy. You do have a password policy, right? Searching for weak passwords should take no time at all. There is no reason for using brute-force for policy compliance. As soon as you start brute-forcing you are trying to hack user accounts and I suspect that would be against your security policy. Kenton ----- Original Message ---- From: WALI <hkhasgiwale@gmail.com> To: security-basics@securityfocus.com Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2007 10:15:46 AM Subject: Highlighting weak password dangers I want to highlight the danger of using weak passwords on servers and users admin desktops. I have tested TSgrinder with a basic dictionary Brute Force to access Remote Desktop exploit on both servers and desktops. The problem here is that when connected to domain, the Account Lockout feature disables the account quite soon. I can only show the exploit on machines not connected to the domain where Domain Security policy doesn't flow down. What are other interesting and intriguing ways to present this problem? I also need a system to do Passwords Audit on my domain and make then 'secure password' policy compliance. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Port 8081 mystery, Steven Nixon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Encryption Key Management System, Jaime A. Diaz |
| Previous by Thread: | Getting cookies, Mac Mohan |
| Next by Thread: | re: Highlighting weak password dangers, Kenton Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |