You sould take a look at the NAC technology from Mirage Networks. This is a
clientless aproach to NAC in opposite to Cisco and independant of the operating
system.
http://www.miragenetworks.com
Regards,
Jaime Ruiz V.
============================================================
Jaime Ruiz Villegas
Gerente de Proyectos Especiales, NeoSecure S.A. - Web: www.neosecure.net
Email: jruiz@neosecure.cl - Phone:+56.2 2905919 - Mobile:+56.9 7995848
CHILE - Phone:+56-2.2905900, Fax:+56.2 2905959
Providencia 1760 Of. 1601, Santiago. CP7500498
ARGENTINA - Phone:+54-11.48501310, Fax:+54.11.48501201
Bouchard 557/599 Piso 20 C 1106 ABG, Buenos Aires
===================== Nota de Confidencialidad ==================
La información contenida en este mail es confidencial y ha sido enviada en
forma exclusiva al destinatario del mismo, quién no debe divulgarla sin
previo consentimiento de NeoSecure.
============================================================
-----Mensaje original-----
De: listbounce@securityfocus.com [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com] En
nombre de WALI
Enviado el: Sábado, 20 de Enero de 2007 3:59
Para: security-basics@securityfocus.com
Asunto: How to securing endpoints?
Seeking pointers on how to secure endpoints within the LAN.
With an AD domain running, without any Radius authentication mechanism, I am
wondering whether it would be worth investing yet, in the nascent
Microsoft/CISCO NAC technology.
My main concern is, to find ways to prohibit anyone/everyone to be able to just
plugin their PC/laptop into the UTP wall socket and get a lease from my DHCP
servers. We are looking at a network of about 1000 pc's here.
MAC learning and locking at the switch layer is an option but I foresee a huge
administrative overhead in my scenerio where helpdesk rolls out several new
PC's daily.
Any other options??
