Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Security-Basics
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Suspicious network activity advice

Subject: Re: Suspicious network activity advice
Date: 26 Dec 2006 16:17:41 -0000
My intial reaction is that it seems irresponsible for them to suspend you from 
work without having any idea what you're truly doing. Did they find scanning 
tools on your computer? Did they find executables to perform scans? Did they 
lock down the system enough that you couldn't scan using USB/CD removable 
tools? They need to do some more digging and isolate what is going on.

To answer your other questions first, yes, old versions of Visio have built-in 
tools to map networks. These were taken out, I believe, in Visio XP and 2003. 
Also, yes, network file searching requires connections (Google 
search/desktop/iTunes/P2P software...anything that searches your network for 
shared files).

As far as what is going on, that is difficult to tell, though. Perhaps your 
computer has turned into a Master Browser or some sort of licensing agent for 
Windows. Considering you are a developer, it could be some licensing agent for 
tools you might use or it could even be SQL broadcast/reply traffic. Have you 
recently installed MSDE or other SQL-related tools? They tend to be very chatty 
on the network, and if a ton of you developers have them installed, that can 
yield back a lot of cross-chatter amongst systems. 

You could also ask them to capture traffic from your system, specifically 
traffic going to those other systems or at the appropriate times of day when 
these connections take place. They should do at least that much diligence to 
attempt to track down the rogue process/tool before affecting someone's 
livelihood.

Also, take inventory of everything you have running and close everything you 
don't absolutely need. This includes iTunes, Winamp, music-playing tools, IM 
tools not specifically mandated by your company/organization, etc. Close them 
and keep them closed.

If you have nothing to hide, definitely invite them over to do intensive 
scanning and monitoring if they need to.

Let us know what happens or comes of this. I reiterate that I find it 
irresponsible of them as IT audit to contribute to your suspension with just 
some guess that you must have used some scanning software...


<-snip->
Could anyone offer me some advice or guidance with this please.

I am developer and have been suspend from work because of ?suspicious network 
activity?. It?s a corporate network (local government) predominantly running a 
combination Microsoft OS?s across many sites.

It seems that many computers on the corporate network have entries in their 
event logs to say that my system logged onto these machines for any instant. 
This happens three times of the course of a single day and but second time my 
computer?s events log shows that each of these computers have logged back into 
my system. 
The IT audit section sent the computer away and it came back clean e.g. no 
viruses and their stance seems to be that they don?t know what has happened but 
they believe that I have used some kind of scanning software.

I?m trying desperately to find another explanation for this, can anyone suggest 
what might have happened. Could using something like visio or a simple file 
search across the network produce similar activity?

They did seems to think that it was relevant that each computer was contact in 
alphabetical order not IP order. 
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>