Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | spam-filtering policy |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 13 Dec 2006 11:49:21 +0800 |
Dear All,
Since there's no 100% effective spam filtering mechanisms so far, is it 'effective' to block (every/some) domains/IPs and have the admin of those domains/IPs send an online application to whitelist the domains/IPs?
If it is an effective policy, wouldn't this create more of a hassle for the admins of valid/innocent domains?
If it isn't an effective policy, why does anyone use it?
The reason why I'm asking is that my co-worker has been trying to send an e-mail to a customer whose ISP seems to be using such a spam-filtering policy. This ISP is blocking my company's domain, for some stupid reason. My company certainly doesn't spam.
Since I'm ever-learning the ins-and-outs of mail server administration, I'm curious as to what everyone here thinks.
Thanks
Ed
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is sponsored by: ByteCrusher
Detect Malicious Web Content and Exploits in Real-Time. Anti-Virus engines can't detect unknown or new threats. LinkScanner can. Web surfing just became a whole lot safer.
http://www.explabs.com/staging/promotions/xern_lspro.asp?loc=sfmaildetect ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Loopholes in a proxy and smtp server, Niranjan Patil |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Exchange vs Groupwise, Spencer Hall |
| Previous by Thread: | Loopholes in a proxy and smtp server, Niranjan Patil |
| Next by Thread: | Re: spam-filtering policy, Frynge Customer Support |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |