Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: The ugly side of using disk encryption |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:13:43 -0400 (EDT) |
<quote who="Hagen, Eric">
Speaking of TrueCrypt, a bruteforce attack is totally out of the question at this point. Any of the three cyphers in use will make the data irrelevantly hard to crack using sheer computing power. the only reason to even bother with the three-cypher is if the data will still be relevant in 20-40 years, when the technology to crack any single cypher *might* be available. However, this would also require a mathematical breakthrough, as the current state of encryption is not just a few orders of magnitude away from being broken, but dozens of orders of magnitude.
That is good to know. And totally changes my point of view. After reading a few other responses, I've also decided the full disk encryption is the only thing that will help me.
As for the use of a hidden partition, this is really only useful for plausable deniability. Creating a hidden partition within a real partition allows the user to give up a passphrase under interrogation or otherwise, and have that passphrase be valid and decrypt some data. Unless your employees are likely to be kidnapped and compelled to disclose their passphrase, the hidden partition does little for your security. You can, however, use any random filename buried within the file structure c:\windows\system32\arrgh.not is just as valid a filename as any other as far as truecrypt is concerned, but having a 10GB file floating around would be pretty obvious to a would-be attacker, so this really only useful for small amounts of data.
My (flawed) idea was that I could auto-mount the encrypted partition on boot that only required a pass phrase. Then the user would manually mount the hidden partition when needed. I thought this would throw an attacker off thinking that if they got the passphrase, they had all the data that is to be gotten from the laptop. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is sponsored by: Norwich University EARN A MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION ASSURANCE - ONLINE The NSA has designated Norwich University a center of Academic Excellence in Information Security. Our program offers unparalleled Infosec management education and the case study affords you unmatched consulting experience. Using interactive e-Learning technology, you can earn this esteemed degree, without disrupting your career or home life. http://www.msia.norwich.edu/secfocus ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Sandboxie, Matt Lye |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Security Search Engine, Saqib Ali |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: The ugly side of using disk encryption, Hagen, Eric |
| Next by Thread: | USB sticks on pubic computers security, Lars |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |