Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Security-Basics
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: RE: The ugly side of using disk encryption

Subject: RE: RE: The ugly side of using disk encryption
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 11:22:22 -0600
The justice system is not intended to offer guidance to the moronic or 
rehabilitation for the deviant. 

It should.

Simply put, ignorance of the law is 
not an excuse and knowingly covering up any crime, is a furtherance of 
a criminal act--a crime. 

What if the encryption is not specific to the crime.  for example, if someone 
operates with full-disk encryption, are they then furthering a crime by storing 
data about a crime on that drive?   What if they use Windows 2000 Encrypted 
Filesystem.  What if they use always-encrypted email like hushmail and happened 
to once send a mail that might be considered evidice of a crime?  

Then again, what if you don't have the passphrase?  Is it a crime to withold 
the passphrase?  If someone is convicted of a crime and refuse to say anything, 
that's a constitutional right...  except if it's a passphrase?

there are too many holes in the concept for me to support this type of thing, 
despite your rhetoric about "save the children" which is approaching academic 
dishonesty as an automatic "shut down the argument" phrase because it riles 
people when you say "I disagree".

Putting cameras in all private spaces and GPS tracking on all children would 
catch pedophiles too.  Think of the children.

Those who prey on children for pleasure, 
pedophiles, are considered  especially heinous because such acts lead 
to the devolution of society and in effect cannibalization of one's 
young.

I agree, however back to our rehabilitation and protection, I'm absolutely not 
an expert on this, but I recall this discussion on slashdot and a lot of 
numbers being thrown around.  But there was only one really in depth study I 
saw regarding sex offender recividism.  Here it is (I had to go dig through my 
slashdot posting history to find it):

http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/rsorp94.pdf

According this study from the United States Department of Justice, Sex 
offenders are the least likely category of all classes of criminals to be 
rearrested and reconvicted.  They have the lowest re-conviction percentage (in 
terms of arrests) and are also the least likely to be reconvicted for the same 
crime as they were previously.  Like I said, I'm not an expert, but am 
regurgitating the conclusions i drew from a discussion with a number of 
seemingly more knowledgable people.

I understand that any re-conviction is a bad thing, but I also recognize that 
putting hundreds of thousands of people in prison for extended periods is 
socially destructive as well.  Our arrest rates have been accelerating linearly 
for the last 40 years.  If the rate continues, more than 15% of the US 
population will be in prision by 2050.  Pedophiles and terrorists are a 
convienant extreme case, but laws should be made also considering borderline 
and minor cases, not just the most extreme murder-abduction-rape-bombing.  
Violent crime in the US is down by 50% since the 1970s you know.  Sexual 
assault is down by over 100% IIRC, despite media claims otherwise and high 
profile cases everywhere.  But the hysteria surrounding it is reaching new 
heights, which I attribute to media saturation.  Frankly, one article I read 
said that the incidence of sexual assault isn't down, but reporting of it is 
down because the penalties are so severe, people shy away from reporting all 
but extreme cases.

Call me crazy, i've heard it before. .

And thanks to the number of people who have emailed me privately with words of 
encouragement and agreement.

Eric


Hagen, Eric wrote:
I am firmly of the belief that it is a corruption of justice to 
use the judicial system to seek revenge, or "provide closure" for 
a victim's family.

It is intended to offer guidance, rehabilitation and in the worst 
cases (like this one) to remove the offender from the public.

I have been close friend to a victim of a very nasty case of a 
similar nature, but i stand firm by my belief that this is not the 
way it should be regarded.

For the benefit of the list (being technical in nature), I propose 
we wrap up this discussion as it is a philosophical disagreement 
rather than a technical one.  I think making encryption a crime, 
regardless of the circumstances is contrary to civiand often done 
for the wrong reasons and I'll leave it at that.

Eric

PS smart criminals store their information in a hidden partition 
and get around this whole thing....  and we're back to "minor" 
crimials getting tagged...  or so the theory goes.


On 10/19/06, Hagen, Eric <hagene@denvernewspaperagency.com> wrote:
How about if you cleaned up the scene of a crime so that it was 
nearly impossible to identify you as the culprit?  Should this be 
prosecutable?  You were using gloves and a mop to attempt to cover 
up misdeeds.  Is this a crime?  Should it be a crime?   How does 
encryption differ?

No, it is very different. In this case a pedophile is using 
encryption
to illegally hold back information from the law enforcement 
agencies -
the information that can be used to solve several crimes and bring
closure to victim's families. What you are talking about is 
completely
off-topic.

What I am talking about is when a criminal is "already convicted" the
DA can make deals with the pedophile in exchange of leniency in
sentencing. My proposal give more leverage to  the office of DA to
make these kinds of deals.

If you are the family of a victim wouldn't you want to some kind of
closure even if the pedophile is already behind bars for a different
case?

Remember:
"The art of policing is, in order not to punish often, to punish 
severely"
-- 
Saqib Ali, CISSP, ISSAP
http://www.full-disk-encryption.net

-------------------------------------------------------------------
--------



---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Norwich University

EARN A MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION ASSURANCE - ONLINE
The NSA has designated Norwich University a center of Academic Excellence 
in Information Security. Our program offers unparalleled Infosec management 
education and the case study affords you unmatched consulting experience. 
Using interactive e-Learning technology, you can earn this esteemed degree, 
without disrupting your career or home life.

http://www.msia.norwich.edu/secfocus
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Norwich University

EARN A MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION ASSURANCE - ONLINE
The NSA has designated Norwich University a center of Academic Excellence 
in Information Security. Our program offers unparalleled Infosec management 
education and the case study affords you unmatched consulting experience. 
Using interactive e-Learning technology, you can earn this esteemed degree, 
without disrupting your career or home life.

http://www.msia.norwich.edu/secfocus
---------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>