-----Original Message-----
From: Hylton Conacher(ZR1HPC) [mailto:hylton@conacher.co.za]
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 8:49 AM
To: Security basics
Subject: Re: Different terms for the same or more secure?
OK so a physical subnetted network is 'safer'/'more secure'
than a VLAN network.
I'm still not getting the difference between a virtual and a
physical LAN. Can anyone give me an example of say a company
with two branches in different locations with each branch
have its own sales and accounts department. I would subnet my IP such:
Office A 192.168.0.x
Office B 192.168.1.x
The departments of each office would have IP's from their
respective subnet.
Sales A 192.168.0.1
Sales B 192.168.1.1
Accounts A 192.168.0.2
Accounts B 192.168.1.2
Make sense?
tnx for the help
Different locations? Then you want two physical LANs, each with
their own address block, and you might use a third (tiny) block
to manage the WAN link between locations.
Where you would use VLANs is to separate different departments
(or organizational units or security contexts) *in the same
physical vicinity*. Instead of mounting two adjacent devices
(physical), you install a single device and ("logically") partition
it (virtual).
David Gillett
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Norwich University
EARN A MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION ASSURANCE - ONLINE
The NSA has designated Norwich University a center of Academic Excellence
in Information Security. Our program offers unparalleled Infosec management
education and the case study affords you unmatched consulting experience.
Using interactive e-Learning technology, you can earn this esteemed degree,
without disrupting your career or home life.
http://www.msia.norwich.edu/secfocus
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
