Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: True Clientless SSLVPN |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 1 Jun 2006 10:47:46 -0700 |
So then how would it work? The SSL code on the client is built into the browser. But in order to be able to *tunnel* over it, you almost certainly need additional code: a plug-in, a java applet, an ActiveX control, *SOMETHING*. As I understand it, when vendors say "clientless", they mean "client browsers will automatically download the piece they need, your users do not have to separately install a new component to enable VPN use". I think that if you define "TRUE clientless" as "that's not clientless enough", then you're looking for somebody to sprinkle invisible(!) pixie dust on your clients when the user isn't looking. I was under the impression that the purpose of the Cisco client's SSL feature was to allow customers who already have IPSEC VPNs to start deploying SSL VPNs as well without confusing the end users. Is it actually *required* in order to use their SSL VPN solutions? That would seem to defeat the major benefit of SSL for VPNs. David Gillett
-----Original Message----- From: Bein, Matthew [mailto:BeinM@ummhc.org] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 10:19 AM To: 'Huzeyfe Onal' Cc: security-basics@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: True Clientless SSLVPN Hello, Most of the solutions like Cisco or Netscreen require a client. I'm looking for one that does not require any download... Thanks, Matthew -----Original Message----- From: Huzeyfe Onal [mailto:huzeyfe.onal@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 1:15 PM To: beinm@ummhc.org Cc: security-basics@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: True Clientless SSLVPN Hi, what do you mean true clientless? All SSL VPN products are clientless(Except OpenVPN). SSL VPNs allow users to connect securely only a web browser.. You can try SSLExplorer (http://sourceforge.net/projects/sslexplorer/) or another SSL VPN solutions. On 31 May 2006 01:22:12 -0000, beinm@ummhc.org <beinm@ummhc.org> wrote:Has anyone seen a true clientless SSLVPN Solution? Thanks, Matthew-- Huzeyfe ÖNAL --- Ag Guvenligi Listesine uye oldunuz mu? http://www.huzeyfe.net/netsec.html <html><body><i>The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, transmission, re-transmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.</i></body></html>
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | How can I track this down?, Nick Duda |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: True Clientless SSLVPN, Portz, Jon |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: True Clientless SSLVPN, Bein, Matthew |
| Next by Thread: | Re: True Clientless SSLVPN, ChrisSerafin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |