Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Security-Basics
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RE: Wireless Security (Part 2)

Subject: Re: RE: Wireless Security (Part 2)
Date: Wed, 24 May 2006 13:36:47 +0200
On 2006-05-23 Lloydm wrote:
All of these issues are FINALLY no longer issues with the soon to be
"officially" release system from www.kmdo.com.  100% security,
guaranteed! 

What a big load of bullshit.

Not only you have to entrust your entire communication to one company,
this company also uses propietary technology so you can never be sure
*how* secure this really is. Why does this use proprietary, "bleeding-
edge" technology instead of established, well-tested and known secure
technology? When it comes to security, bleeding-edge is *always* a bad
idea, because it cannot be tested well enough (otherwise it wouldn't be
bleeding-edge).

In addition to that the system accepts mail only from previously
approved addresses, meaning that you will practically devoid yourself of
Internet mail (how is a potential customer going to contact you?), which
is - as I might add - something that can be easily set up by oneself
with a whitelisting spam filter.

I really don't need this kind of spam on the list.

Regards
Ansgar Wiechers
-- 
"If you think technology can solve your security problems, then you
don't understand the problems and you don't understand the technology."
--Bruce Schneier

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>