Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Article: "Security Absurdity: The Complete, Unquestionable, And Total Failure of Information Security." |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 24 May 2006 01:17:06 -0400 |
Hello, Just as organizations require SLAs from connection providers (telecomm, network, internet, power), one (organization) should require a Security SLA. This should be included as part-and-parcel of privacy, non-disclosure, and SoX (or other legislative requirements for ones only organization) Statements of Conformity. For example: Because of various legislative, legal, reporting and policy requirements one performs a process and maintains a level of security, risk, privacy, reporting and whatnot. When this process involves an outside 3rd parity one should require that the levels of security, risk, privacy, reporting and whatnot are maintained even by the outside organization. Also, that one can audit the outside 3rd parity for conformance. It is the responsibility of the "kick-off" organization to be in conformance regardless of who, or where part of a process takes place. A SLA or Statements of Conformity for security should be a requirement. ----- What is the point of being all "safe and secure" and then letting an outside 3rd party with nonexistent security perform some kind of processing or whatnot. One should require that the "safe and secure" things that are being done by your organization are also being done by the outside 3rd party at the same or higher level that your organization is. Regards, -- Jason Muskat | GCUX - de VE3TSJ ____________________________ TechDude e. Jason@TechDude.Ca m. 416 .414 .9934 http://TechDude.Ca/
From: Angela and Donald <info@dna-works.com> Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 20:31:43 -0600 To: 'Jason Muskat' <Jason@TechDude.Ca> Cc: <security-basics@securityfocus.com> Subject: RE: Article: "Security Absurdity: The Complete, Unquestionable, And Total Failure of Information Security."good record with consumer data. If your local Telco can offer 99.995% uptime why shouldn't security.Ummm, because those aren't even remotely the same thing? Because increasing uptime does not invariably lead customers to try to circumvent that uptime because it's too difficult to use? Because uptime will never be sacrificed on the altar of short-term savings? I understand and sympathize with your point but those are not even slightly comparable metrics and you do both yourself and your clients a disservice thinking that they are .... Donald Wheeler
| Previous by Date: | RE: Article: "Security Absurdity: The Complete, Unquestionable, And Total Failure of Information Security.", Angela and Donald |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Wireless Security (Part 2), Ian Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Article: "Security Absurdity: The Complete, Unquestionable, And Total Failure of Information Security.", Angela and Donald |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Article: "Security Absurdity: The Complete, Unquestionable, And Total Failure of Information Security.", Adam Vollmer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |