Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Article: "Security Absurdity: The Complete, Unquestionable, And Total Failure of Information Security." |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 19 May 2006 21:17:36 -0400 |
Hello, That is a great example! A secure system is rendered insecure because of only one omission. Even with the best policies, and security technology one mistake resulted in a security system failure (an exposure). Most exposures result from only one omission. Just one, and only one. This maybe a setting in a config file, a broken process, or a procedure that isn't followed correctly (think aircraft part assembly). Security must do a better job in lowing exposures as apposed to lowering risk (current practices). ____________________________ TechDude e. Jason@TechDude.Ca m. 416 .414 .9934 http://TechDude.Ca/
From: Saqib Ali <docbook.xml@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 06:25:10 -0700 To: Jason Muskat <Jason@techdude.ca> Cc: Bob Radvanovsky <rsradvan@unixworks.net>, "Sadler, Connie" <Connie_Sadler@brown.edu>, <email@securityabsurdity.com>, <security-basics@securityfocus.com> Subject: Re: Article: "Security Absurdity: The Complete, Unquestionable, And Total Failure of Information Security."Security has to be correct 100% of the time. One omission can lead to anI don't disagree with you. However aboslute security requires absolute non-existence of the information. For e.g. You can have IPS, IDS, DRM, TPM, AV, Firewall etc on your netowork, but as soon as somebody prints out that confidential document and tosses it in a garbage can, you security goes with it. Another e.g.: Everyone knows that one-time pad provides the "perfect secrecy". But then how did the British intercept the Soviet communications???? Soviet re-used the OTP, which allowed for statistical analysis and/or pattern matching. Re-using seemed pretty harmless at that time, but in retrospect it was a big mistake. Isn't everything in retrospect a mistake? Security has 3 core priciples Confidentiality(non-disclosure), Integrity, Availability(non-destruction). In in way Confidentiality is inversely propotional to Availability (i think). By making something available you are increasing the chances of its disclosure. So in theory 100% security is not possible. -- Saqib Ali, CISSP, ISSAP Support http://www.capital-punishment.net ----------- "I fear, if I rebel against my Lord, the retribution of an Awful Day (The Day of Resurrection)" Al-Quran 6:15 -----------
| Previous by Date: | Re: Article: "Security Absurdity: The Complete, Unquestionable, And Total Failure of Information Security.", Jason Muskat |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Kingston DTE Privacy Edition, aaron . w . edwards |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Article: "Security Absurdity: The Complete, Unquestionable, And Total Failure of Information Security.", Saqib Ali |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Article: "Security Absurdity: The Complete, Unquestionable, And Total Failure of Information Security.", Stephen John Smoogen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |