Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Wireless Security (Part 2) |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 16 May 2006 11:47:08 -0700 |
No, for two reasons. 1. You haven't mentioned any way to ensure that the intruder visits that page and sees it, let alone agrees to its conditions. [Technology exists to address this, it's called a "captive portal". So this problem, at least, can be solved.] 2. Can you post a sign on your driveway, giving yourself the right to search any cars that park there that you don't recognize? I don't think so. You have the right to report them to the *police*, who in turn might determine that a search warrant (or one of the few exceptions) is appropriate, but simply arrogating that authority to yourself is risky at best. Really, it would be a whole lot simpler to (a) secure the network in the first place, and (b) ban and/or report any intruder who gets past that security. [If you lock access to a list of MAC addresses, the only way an intruder can get in is to spoof one of those addresses, and so identifying and banning him will be problematic at best.] An awful lot of the intruders I encounter have a NetBIOS name set, so their computer offers me clues about who they are *without* any kind of counter-intrusion on my part. And since they're just looking for free bandwidth, it doesn't take a lot of banning effort before they decide to go somewhere easier. My current "ban" list is not very long, and there's only one entry on there for which the police *will* be called if it shows up again. But that one wasn't just hitching a free Internet connection.... David Gillett
-----Original Message----- From: Ebeling, Jr., Herman Frederick [mailto:hfebelingjr@lycos.com] Sent: Monday, May 15, 2006 2:34 PM To: security-basics@securityfocus.com Subject: Wireless Security (Part 2) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 A few months back we had a discussion going about whether or not a person who has setup a Wi-Fi network for their and their families use. And IF someone illegally connects to said network if the person who setup the network has the right to go into the other person's computer to find out who they are. The consensus is/was that sadly no the person who setup the Wi-Fi network doesn't have the right to go into the intruder's computer to find out who they are. What IF the person who sets up the Wi-Fi network has a web page, or a dialog box that is displayed that says the following whenever a new computer signs onto the network: WARNING You have connected to a PRIVATE COMPUTER NETWORK IF you were NOT invited to join the network then leave now. IF you continue to use the network, know that by doing so you consent to having your computer inspected for the purpose of finding out who you are so that the proper authorities can be notified. IF you leave now no actions will be taken, but IF you continue then the appropriate actions WILL be taken, you have been WARNED. This is your ONLY warning, leave NOW. Also know that along with your name your computers MAC address will also be recorded, and blocked in the future. If the above is setup as a web page then the capitalized words would be in bold as well as red to catch the person's attention. Also with the above they wouldn't be able to say that they weren't warned, correct? - ----- Herman Live Long and Prosper ___________________ _-_ \==============_=_/ ____.---'---`---.____ \_ \ \----._________.----/ \ \ / / `-_-' __,--`.`-'..'-_ /____ ||- `--.____,-' -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 Comment: Space the Final Frontier iQA/AwUBRGjzqx/i52nbE9vTEQL2VgCfa6k5g7v+iXyLAWn8x0C4puoejFIAnA0l pyeqL5W4eOfzDQCLuHEk31Q/ =c+u5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Enterprise software for identifing user removing software, Saqib Ali |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | FW: Encrypting data on fileserver, Nick Vaernhoej |
| Previous by Thread: | Re : Wireless Security (Part 2), Maxime COSTE |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Wireless Security (Part 2), Ian Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |