Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Scanning hosts behind a NAT |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 25 Apr 2006 15:42:30 +0400 (MSD) |
Hi list ;), I'm a student and I'm trying to learn how nmap does its job. Today, for example, I tried to scan my home network ( ;) )... In fact, I've 2 computers behind a router (which does wireless AP, router & firewall: linksys wrt54g). Then, I tried to scan from "outside" the network (aka: from a friend on the internet). On the router (LAN ip: 192.168.1.1) , I've the port 6356 (Gnutella) which is forwarded to 192.168.1.2 (my first pc). When I tried to scan from outside, I obviously obtain: Starting Nmap 4.01 ( http://www.insecure.org/nmap/ ) at 2006-04-22 18:26 CEST Warning: OS detection will be MUCH less reliable because we did not find at least 1 open and 1 closed TCP port Interesting ports on 80.13.xx.yy: (The 1671 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: filtered) PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION 6346/tcp closed gnutella Too many fingerprints match this host to give specific OS details In fact, it was what I was expecting for. My question is how to scan the hosts behind the router (NAT) ? Is it possible ? Thanks N. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This List Sponsored by: Webroot
AFAIK no, because of the NAT nature. It was designed to hide real network. In fact there are some methods to count hosts behind NAT (search history of the list and latest numbers of phrack), but that is all. -- Roman Shirokov Systems Administrator 85A4 8586 FEEE 171B D0F1 A9C1 27C8 A907 EE45 7D0E http://securitybox.org.ru e-mail: securitybox@softhome.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This List Sponsored by: Webroot Don't leave your confidential company and customer records un-protected. Try Webroot's Spy Sweeper Enterprise(TM) for 30 days for FREE with no obligation. See why so many companies trust Spy Sweeper Enterprise to eradicate spyware from their networks. FREE 30-Day Trial of Spy Sweeper Enterprise http://www.webroot.com/forms/enterprise_lead.php --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Password Management, cv arun |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Password Management, Derek Schaible |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Scanning hosts behind a NAT, Craig Van Tassle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [unisog] OT: Putting Encyption Functions in the HDDs, Saqib Ali |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |