Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: application for an employment |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 30 Mar 2006 12:19:50 -0500 |
On 2006-03-29 Craddock, Larry wrote:That may be how you interpret it but I think they're very analogous. The point is simple ... no one has any legitimate business checking the status of the doors and windows on my property and no one has any legitimate business port scanning someone else's network. What legitimate reason would I have in port scanning your network? Let me answer that for you ... absolutely none. At best, my answer would be curiosity and that doesn't qualify as legitimate.*sigh* I'd rather stayed out of this discussion, but since various people have shown a gross ignorance of the technial realities of the 'net I'll throw my 2 cent in. The legitimate reason you have is the simple fact that you don't have any other option of determining what services are available on a given host or range of hosts. It's absolutely ridiculous to think that one would need express permission to find out whether a shop is open or not. Or if there is a shop in the first place. Of course if your scan breaks something you may (or may not) be held liable for that, but that's a different story.
I agree. Pointing a web browser to a server that does not offer any http/https services could be thought of as a "port scan". Same with accidentally pointing anything, whether it be telnet, ssh, ftp, r*, or any kind of network tool, at a server that does not offer those services. A connect has to be made to find out if you can use that service. There is nothing malicious in that. It's easy to make the analogy between real-world private property and trespass, but it simply doesn't equate well to the network world. There's a reason why they're called PUBLIC IP addresses. Anybody that connects a machine to the *public* internet should *expect* to be scanned. This is public information and can be freely used. If scanning were illegal and criminal, what of Netcraft? What of search engine spiders? Back to the OP's topic.. I wouldn't offer that information during the interview or *even on the job*. EDU's can be political and you don't want to get mixed up in that. You could use what information you've learned about the school's network to help raise some awareness about what network security is and what can be done if a network isn't secured. Then go about properly scanning the network both internally and externally with written consent. Sincerely, Mike Fetherston --------------------------------------------------------------------------- EARN A MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION ASSURANCE - ONLINE The Norwich University program offers unparalleled Infosec management education and the case study affords you unmatched consulting experience. Tailor your education to your own professional goals with degree customizations including Emergency Management, Business Continuity Planning, Computer Emergency Response Teams, and Digital Investigations. http://www.msia.norwich.edu/secfocus ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Family protection - proxy?, Saqib Ali |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Family protection - proxy?, James Fryman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: application for an employment, Ansgar -59cobalt- Wiechers |
| Next by Thread: | RE: application for an employment, Craig Wright |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |