Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: application for an employment |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 22 Mar 2006 13:36:27 -0700 |
It's a sad thing that the overwhelming majority of respondents to this question advise Matthias against informing his prospective employer of the security problems he's observed in his employer's network. As a practical matter I guess they are correct. He's more likely to be shown the door (if not actually prosecuted) than to be admired for his technical skill and initiative, should he reveal his discoveries.
But the fact that this is true does not in any way make it right, and it makes me sad and angry that these attitudes and policies, born of ignorance and paranoia, are now becoming codified as standards of ethics and professionalism.
Let's forget about the word "ethics" for the moment, since more often than not discussions on "ethics" are skewed based on the character of those involved in the discussion.
Let's focus, instead, on the actual goal of a company or university. When hiring an employee, the generic goal of that employee is to help facilitate the survival of his or her employer. The goal of this entity is solely survival in order to pursue some eventual goal.
Now, when accepting an employee for placement into a job, are you going to consider their character? Absolutely. Their actions define how they perceive your institution. If their actions are proving to be more directed towards fulfilling their own selfish goals of proving skills rather than respecting the privacy of the institution, are you going to hire them?
To hire someone without the ability to constrain themselves against unauthorized activity is foolish. More often than not these are the kinds of people that will speak about their findings to others outside the institution because they believe the discussion is of some intellectual merit. Rather, they're risking the institution's security by discussion information with people that have no right to know such information.
Forget "ethics", it's all about doing what is necessary to pursue the survival of a given institution so their long term goals may be achieved. *That* should guide your best practices.
Don "north" Bailey
http://www.msia.norwich.edu/secfocus ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Previous by Date: | RE: Signing before Encryption and Signing after Encryption, David Gillett |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Signing before Encryption and Signing after Encryption, Gregory Rubin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: application for an employment, PCSC Information Services |
| Next by Thread: | Re: application for an employment, Raoul Armfield |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |