Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Re[2]: MS in information security |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:25:43 +1100 |
Hi Vladimir,
I am sorry, but I do not find your first sentance clear and I am not sure what
you stating.
In answer to cryptography being everything:
Kerckhoff's Principle, "The security of a cryptosystem must not depend on the
secrecy of the system used. Rather, the security of a cryptosystem may depend
only on the secrecy of the keys used." (Jea Guillaume Hubert Victor Francois
Alexandre Auguste Kerckhoffs von Nieuwenhof (1835 to 1903) in La cryptographie
militaire).
A systems security is only ever as safe as the security of the keys. This leads
us to a number of issues:
1 Personal - people can compromise any crypto system either intentionally or
not. Trust in the tools alone is a good way to be compromised.
2 No algorithim is perfect, they all have a defined life and expected time to
compromise. This time function is also time dependant as crack times decrease
as a function of time to an inverse exponential degree.
Next there is the fact that it is possible to make a "secure system" without
crypto. By securing a private fibre link between two offices using all methods
of ensuring that the line is not tapped etc it is possible to make a fairly
secure point to point link. The alternative is to encrypt the nodes over a less
secure and less costly media. The level of security using any crypto is going
to be less in this manner as the security again goes to the security of the
keys which are easier to attack becasue of people than a burried fibre line
(excluding attack by back-hoe).
Crypto is a compromise due to cost. All be if often a good one, it is still a
security comprmise.
Think of the BEST crypto system, the time to crack creates a cost to crack.
When this becomes prohibitive there are other means to compromise the system
(ie Security is a RISK function). It is no good to place more expenditure to
the protection than the value of the information (cases of life threatening
attacks are excluded from this arguement and would be dealt with separately).
This is not economic.
So if you have information worth $1,000,000 and THE BEST crypto system costing
all of that - there is still a way to compromise it. Find an engineer who will
accept $250,000 to give you the keys (and it is not likely to cost this much).
Thus the best crypto system is compromised without effort. As stated, crypto is
but one tool in a toolbox
Regards,
Craig
-----Original Message-----
From: Vladimir B. Kropotov [mailto:slyman2000@Mail.ru]
Sent: Mon 27/02/2006 10:39 PM
To: Craig Wright
Cc: security-basics@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re[2]: MS in information security
Hi Craig.
CW> Although the maths is useful to have and I will never tell
CW> anyone not to study, it is in this case not a part of the answer.
CW> Security is not just about crypto.
Unfortunately in year 2000 I was amazing, that crypto is the Only way
to real security, but now I agree with this opinion.
Only cryptography suppose absolutelly open information about all, but
encryption keys. You can get all - hardware. storage devices, traffic,
files, etc. But you will take NOTHING.
Another security measures is like an additional wall, you can jump
over the wall, you can brake it, and get control on protected system.
Security without cryptography is a kind of superficial glance to
security, only Cryptography is real base for Real security.
Regards
Vladimir
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
in respect of matters arising within those States and Territories of Australia
where such legislation exists.
DISCLAIMER
The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential. If
you are not the intended recipient, you must not use or disclose the
information. If you have received this email in error, please inform us
promptly by reply email or by telephoning +61 2 9286 5555. Please delete the
email and destroy any printed copy.
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender. You may
not rely on this message as advice unless it has been electronically signed by
a Partner of BDO or it is subsequently confirmed by letter or fax signed by a
Partner of BDO.
BDO accepts no liability for any damage caused by this email or its attachments
due to viruses, interference, interception, corruption or unauthorised access.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RE: Sun cans Trusted Solaris, was Why Easy To Use Software Is Putting You At Risk, jchambers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: AD Aware Firewall/Proxy device, Steven Jones |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: RE: MS in information security, deepakjmanohar |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Snort as Firewall (WinXP), ilaiy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |