Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Security-Basics
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: secure disposal of backup tapes

Subject: Re: secure disposal of backup tapes
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:43:36 +0000 GMT
I had thought of the degausserbut a reading more and more stories of it not 
working -maybe lazy data disposal companies. I decided to try the shredding 
method with one and found that the estimated 2000 pieces that the tape became 
would hopefully prevent anyone from reading anything from it. I can already 
hear the more paranoid of you saying that a 3.0 letter agency could easily 
reconstruct it but I have to go with 'most likely' here.
Love the bonfire idea though. I'll see if finance will approve some beer too.
-----Original Message-----
From: Saqib Ali <docbook.xml@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:58:53 
To:"John R. Dennison" <jrd@gerdesas.com>
Cc:Murad Talukdar <talukdar_m@subway.com>, security-basics@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: secure disposal of backup tapes

        Depending upon the local I would tend to think that destruction
        by fire would be against local codes due to the materials involved.

        Would not a strong magnetic source work instead?

Using a magnetic source is degaussing, which results in Data Remnance.
For "Secret" and "Top Secret" classification level Media Destruction
is required. Desgaussing will not work for these classification
levels.

For "Confidential", destruction is preferred, but degaussing is
allowed. (I think).

--
In Peace,
Saqib Ali
http://www.xml-dev.com/blog/
Consensus is good, but informed dictatorship is better.


Kind Regards
Murad Talukdar
Senior Computer Operator
Subway Systems Australia
**DISCLAIMER**
The information contained in this e-mail and attachments, if any, is 
confidential and may be subject to legal privilege.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, you must not use, copy, distribute or disclose the e-mail 
and its attachment, or any part of its content or take any action in reliance 
of it.  If you have received this e-mail in error, please e-mail the message 
back to the sender by replying and then deleting it. 
We cannot accept responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of this 
e-mail or attachments, and recommend that you subject these to your virus 
checking procedures prior to use.  Thank you.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>