Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: secure disposal of backup tapes |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 23 Nov 2005 22:43:36 +0000 GMT |
I had thought of the degausserbut a reading more and more stories of it not working -maybe lazy data disposal companies. I decided to try the shredding method with one and found that the estimated 2000 pieces that the tape became would hopefully prevent anyone from reading anything from it. I can already hear the more paranoid of you saying that a 3.0 letter agency could easily reconstruct it but I have to go with 'most likely' here. Love the bonfire idea though. I'll see if finance will approve some beer too. -----Original Message----- From: Saqib Ali <docbook.xml@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:58:53 To:"John R. Dennison" <jrd@gerdesas.com> Cc:Murad Talukdar <talukdar_m@subway.com>, security-basics@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: secure disposal of backup tapes
Depending upon the local I would tend to think that destruction
by fire would be against local codes due to the materials involved.
Would not a strong magnetic source work instead?
Using a magnetic source is degaussing, which results in Data Remnance. For "Secret" and "Top Secret" classification level Media Destruction is required. Desgaussing will not work for these classification levels. For "Confidential", destruction is preferred, but degaussing is allowed. (I think). -- In Peace, Saqib Ali http://www.xml-dev.com/blog/ Consensus is good, but informed dictatorship is better. Kind Regards Murad Talukdar Senior Computer Operator Subway Systems Australia **DISCLAIMER** The information contained in this e-mail and attachments, if any, is confidential and may be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, copy, distribute or disclose the e-mail and its attachment, or any part of its content or take any action in reliance of it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please e-mail the message back to the sender by replying and then deleting it. We cannot accept responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of this e-mail or attachments, and recommend that you subject these to your virus checking procedures prior to use. Thank you.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: secure disposal of backup tapes, Steven Jones |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: secure disposal of backup tapes, Aditya Deshmukh |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: secure disposal of backup tapes, oystein |
| Next by Thread: | Re: secure disposal of backup tapes, Neksus |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |