Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Unknow process listening on high port |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:22:26 -0700 |
I have run the chkrootkit and found nothing to indicate the box has been
compromised. Nmap failed to give any more information, but rpcinfo gave
me a something more to looks at. Here is the output for the command you
gave me:
Server1:/ # rpcinfo -p 127.0.0.1
program vers proto port
100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper
100000 2 udp 111 portmapper
100024 1 udp 32828 status
100021 1 udp 32828 nlockmgr
100021 3 udp 32828 nlockmgr
100021 4 udp 32828 nlockmgr
100024 1 tcp 39207 status
100021 1 tcp 39207 nlockmgr
100021 3 tcp 39207 nlockmgr
100021 4 tcp 39207 nlockmgr
It like that is it!
Thanks everybody for all of your help with this problem.
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 13:54 -0400, Justin wrote:
Shawn, netstat reports a '-' for the PID becuase it does not know whats listening on that port. It appears from your swasprod1:/ # rpcinfo -p 127.0.0.1
hell output that you issued netstat as root, and thus should have gotten that PID. However, its not uncommon to run across this. You say that nmap reported these ports as open? Did you try and use -sV for nmap to do a version scan and see what it is? I'd go and download nmap 3.90 from insecure.org and do a version scan against those services. (something like: `nmap -sS -sV -p0- -oN scan-log 127.0.0.1' should do nicley). You might also see if THC's amap has any idea what these services are. Did you scan the system with chkrootkit or rkhunter to see if there were any trojans and the like? BTW, I'm just guessing but, 39207 looks to be an RPC port to me. Try `rpcinfo -p 127.0.0.1' and see if it shows up. GL, and I hope that it all turns out okay for you. peace, --Justin On 10/26/05, Shawn Badger <sbadger@cskauto.com> wrote:Fuser says the port is here, but gives no more information. I have ran chkrootkit on the servers and fortunately they both came back clean. I have also started watching traffic on the ports in question and noticed every so often that and pulls a couple test web pages. This is part of the High availability service and just using that high port to connect to the other server. I am not seeing any connections coming into the port in 24 hours of monitoring. I will keep monitoring and see what I find. Does anyone know why netstat reports a - for the pid though?
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: remote desktop, Saqib Ali |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Cisco Books, Andrew Chong |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Unknow process listening on high port, Justin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Unknow process listening on high port, Adam |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |