Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Wardialing - Odd Results |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 27 Jul 2005 11:30:34 -0500 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hey guys, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 09:43:32AM -0700, Atom Powers wrote:I've seen this if the data rate for the system you are dialing in to and the program you are using are not in synch. For instance, if the system you are dialing to is 9600bps and you have your hyperterminal set to 1500bps you will end up getting many duplicate bits, because you are sampling more frequently than you are recieving. The result is garbage like you show below even if the system you are dialing to is responding with ASCII characters.Any mis-configured serial port settings (baud, parity, data bits, stop bits) can cause this behaviour. In /general/, the hyperterminal default settings of 8/N/1 should work in most, but not all cases; some older mainframe based equipment, for instance, will use 7 data bits with Even parity. If memory serves, in the past I have also had to use even more esoteric settings for parity, such as mark or space, but that was 2 decades ago. John
Thanks for all your answers. I've been relentlessly trying every combination of baud/data bits/parity/stop bits I could think of, but I can't get it to work. I can get it to look different, but that's not much help. I discovered that at least one of the systems that PhoneSweep picked up as "CARRIER" turned out to be a fax machine, so the question becomes, how can I programmatically tell a fax from a modem? Is anybody aware of any kind of software that can reliably identify or cycle through the different protocols until it figures out which it is? And, for preference, which are fax machines? Any platform would be great. Thanks again for your help, Ron -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.9.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFC57apfqSf2EkP4p4RAuZGAJ9eaIWUPyCneOjSql3tSPER+tVP4gCeKxM9 w/nUB8IPMvBQNa9FqS6V5lg= =gxH8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | problem with nmap options, Juan B |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Best spyware program, Craig Wright |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Wardialing - Odd Results, Champ Clark [Vistech] |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: Wardialing - Odd Results, anonymousnz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |