Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Help understanding NMAP results |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:47:20 +0200 |
Sounds weird, usually nmap is very very accurate with its result. Anyway you should post this question directly into the nmap-hackers mailing list. Check it out at http://www.insecure.com o http://seclists.org/#nmap-hackers The list has been quite quiet lately so im sure someone will inmediatly answer your question as we are terribly bored without new messages. Good luck. On 7/7/05, Theodore Wynnychenko <t-wynnychenko@northwestern.edu> wrote:
Hello: Well, hopefully this isn't too "stupid" a question to ask, but I have to ask anyway. I am nothing like a "computer security expert," (my job has nothing to do with IT) but I have been playing with old computers and Linux in my spare time (always learning). Anyway, I have an old computer that runs LEAF LRP (linux kernel 2.4.27 or so) as an external firewall to my home network. This system basically uses Shorewall to administer IPTABLES, and is set to default DROP any packets comming in on the exernal NIC. In the past, I did some basic port scans against myself using "online scanners", and always got back information indicating that no ports were responding (everything was "Stealth" - everything silently dropped). So, while looking around, I came across NMAP, and decided to use it to scan myself. Went over to a friend's house, and ran an NMAP scan against myself (nmap -sS -v -P0 -O xx.xx.xx.xx), and it says "Discovered open port 5190/tcp". Now, this really confuses me. When I scan myself using "online" scanners (directed specifically at 5190), I get back that packets were dropped/"stealthed," but NMAP says its open. I added a specific rule (in addition to the default drop policy) to drop anything to tcp 5190, but this made no difference. The "online" scanners still say nothing there, NMAP still says its open. NMAPs OS identification gives me several possibilities including "Linux 2.4.x|2.5.x," so NMAP does seem to be getting some imformation from the firewall. TCP 5190 is apparently related to AOL IM, but this is not something I have ever used, and I can't think of any reason why the LEAF Firewall would have it open. What am I missing? Thanks in advance for any help. bye - ted
-- Emmanuel Goldstein. Room 101, Ministry of Truth. W2, London. Oceania.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Help understanding NMAP results, mike king |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: force https, Mike Tierney |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Help understanding NMAP results, Nikolai Alexandrov |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Help understanding NMAP results, forums@kentane.net |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |