Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: securing communication channel (FTP) - Need Suggestions |
|---|---|
| Date: | 28 Jun 2005 15:40:31 -0000 |
Firstly, base your choice on the need, not on what standard. What HW platforms do you have, what products do they support, do you have communication within or outside of the organisation and if so, what standard do the external partner have or is willing to use/accept. When you know that, you know what to use as 1:st choice.
(1) Secure FTP (SSL:FTPS) - Any pitfalls I need to be aware of from a setup/implementation standpoint?
Haven't used FTP/S so I can't really say, but on AS/400 and some other IBM mainframe env. it is standard. SSH/sftp do not exist. Tumbleweed and Ipswitch have Unix/PC versions.
- How would the authentication to MySQL user database work?
? Wasn't it ftp the question was about? Do not run MySQL or any ftp-pluggin.
(2) Secure HTTP (https) - Any pitfalls I need to be aware of from a setup/implementation standpoint?
Isn't real ftp, need the backend "CGI" to check transport. Usage more depending on if only web-access or not. Probably more unsecure, due to more security failings in web servers.
(3) a. Scp: b. Sftp: Is it an interactive program? Does it provide non-interactive authentication?
Well, if using sftp (scp) you have ssh and therefore can let all terminal users run ssh, increasing security. On the other side, do you have ssh, you already have sftp, same coin. Have only worked with sftp, not scp, but with certificates generated, it is easy to make batch processes for it. Basis is the following (can be made more "unreadable" = efficient) Solaris Unix script: --- SFILE="$HOME/cache/acme.dat" /usr/5bin/echo "put $SFILE \n quit \n" |\ sftp acme.batch@ac1.acme.com --- Did a sftp batch control shellscript some months ago, that now runs regular for a data transfer. Server exist for PC and different Unixes as well as OpenVMS (HP own version recommended by users). ws_ftp client/server works both ftp/s as sftp (and PGP to top up ;-) SSH.com and F-Secure/WRQ have the most known commercial versions, while OpenSSH.org is the freeware. Only thing to remember, if you run OpenSSH Win-server, the server needs to be run as a ordinary process, not server, and to own it's resources and disk areas. We had problems with that. regards/kurt
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: securing communication channel (FTP) - Need Suggestions, Staff Netelion |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: RE: Masters program for Information Security?, Jawbox |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: securing communication channel (FTP) - Need Suggestions, Staff Netelion |
| Next by Thread: | SF new column announcement: Where's the threat?, Kelly Martin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |