Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Linking Password Length to Write-down probability |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 27 May 2005 08:33:05 -0500 |
Stian: I have also been looking into this particular subject for differing reasons. I want to increase length and complexity requirements at my place of business, but management seems to think their employees are not smart enough to meet the task. From what I have been seeing in my googling, the consensus appears to be to move to the pass-phrase rather than a more complex password. Of course, a really good pass-phrase would meet all those complexity requirements (alphas, numerics, and special characters). Most of the Operating and Networking systems out there support moving to a string up to 128 characters long. The link below is another good source reference for this, but doesn't really answer your query of whether or not there have been studies comparing the length and complexity requirements to the probability of the end user writing their password down. http://www.indevis.de/dokumente/gartner_passwords_breakpoint.pdf Robert Kurth, CISSP -----Original Message----- From: Stian Øvrevåge [mailto:sovrevage@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 4:07 AM To: security-basics@securityfocus.com Subject: Linking Password Length to Write-down probability God morning list! I continually read papers which advertise increased password lenghts ( and outrageous complexity requirements ) as The Solution(TM). I work in a fairly large organization and I can safely acknowledge that even 8 character passwords with moderate complexity requirements are VERY prone to beeing written un-encrypted and un-hashed on Post-Its, and then safely contained, under the keyboard, or on the monitor. Which in my humble oppinion is bordering to "stupid security". I'm certain that there is a link between required password lenght and complexity and the probability of users taking the huge leap backwards and writing passwords down. I've been doing a little Googling, but I can't seem to find any scientific analytical/statistical research done on this particular subject. Is anyone out there aware of any works done in this field? If not, is there anyone intrested in conducting such a survey on the behalf of the community? Regards, Stian
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: help , scripting for security, Smith, Ryan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Symantec LiveUpdate and User Rights on Win2000, adisegna |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Linking Password Length to Write-down probability, Dan Tesch |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Linking Password Length to Write-down probability, John Blackley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |