Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Linking Password Length to Write-down probability |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 26 May 2005 17:46:03 -0300 |
Hi Stian A few days ago i read a post at slashdot: "Microsoft's senior program manager for security policy, Jesper Johansson, presents a provocative but interesting view on password policy: He claims that prohibiting users from writing down their passwords is bad for security. His main point is that if users are prohibited from writing down their passwords, they will use the same easy to guess password everywhere." From the article: "Since not all systems allow good passwords, I am going to pick a really crappy one, use it everywhere and never change it...If I write them down and then protect the piece of paper--or whatever it is I wrote them down on--there is nothing wrong with that. That allows us to remember more passwords and better passwords." http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/24/2047228&tid=172 IMHO as a good BOFH you _MUST_ requiere that all employes use an alphanumeric password (8 or 10 chars minimun)... if they dont his emails, files, or anything else can be redirected to /dev/null ;) No, seriously, i never heard of a "scientific analytical/statistical research" about this subject. But take a look at the post on slashdot good bye -- Gonzalo Martinez On 5/26/05, Stian Øvrevåge <sovrevage@gmail.com> wrote:
God morning list! I continually read papers which advertise increased password lenghts ( and outrageous complexity requirements ) as The Solution(TM). I work in a fairly large organization and I can safely acknowledge that even 8 character passwords with moderate complexity requirements are VERY prone to beeing written un-encrypted and un-hashed on Post-Its, and then safely contained, under the keyboard, or on the monitor. Which in my humble oppinion is bordering to "stupid security". I'm certain that there is a link between required password lenght and complexity and the probability of users taking the huge leap backwards and writing passwords down. I've been doing a little Googling, but I can't seem to find any scientific analytical/statistical research done on this particular subject. Is anyone out there aware of any works done in this field? If not, is there anyone intrested in conducting such a survey on the behalf of the community? Regards, Stian
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: user name from security logs, Greg Stiavetti |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Fiber optic security, Rob Trakil |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Linking Password Length to Write-down probability, Ryan Platt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Linking Password Length to Write-down probability, Nick Owen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |