Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Security-Basics
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Hashing Functions

Subject: RE: Hashing Functions
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:15:13 -0500
No worries.  I was hoping that something substantial info might have
actually been released.  :)

--
ME2
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven DeFord [mailto:security.willworker@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 1:40 PM
To: Micheal Espinola Jr
Cc: security-basics@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Hashing Functions

Although, after reading the linked-to paper, they haven't really said much
of anything other than "We did it!"

So I retract my (implied) claim that details have been published.

Apologies
Steve


On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:27:14 -0800, Steven DeFord
<security.willworker@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:14:06 -0500, Micheal Espinola Jr 
<michealespinola@gmail.com> wrote:
Has it definitively been broken?  I know I have read reports that it

Bruce Schneier's blog post about the collision attack:
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2005/02/sha1_broken.html

The paper itself:
http://theory.csail.mit.edu/~yiqun/shanote.pdf

--
Steven DeFord
Security.Willworker@gmail.com
(925) 596-0426



--
Steven DeFord
Security.Willworker@gmail.com
(925) 596-0426

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>