Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Hashing Functions |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 25 Mar 2005 09:14:06 -0500 |
Has it definitively been broken? I know I have read reports that it is 'reported' to have been broken by a known group of individuals in China - but details were still not released, nor has there been any official word/release about it. Has this status changed? If so, got link? Thanks, On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:21:04 -0800, Steven DeFord <security.willworker@gmail.com> wrote:
I know SHA-1 has been broken. What does this mean for SHA-n (for n <> 1)? Are they significantly different algorithms, or something similar but with longer key length? -- Steven DeFord Security.Willworker@gmail.com (925) 596-0426
-- ME2 my home: <http://www.santeriasys.net/> my photos: <http://mespinola.blogspot.com/>
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Wireless Keyboards, Matthew F. Caldwell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: GIAC Dilution, Matthew Jenkins |
| Previous by Thread: | Hashing Functions, Steven DeFord |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Hashing Functions, Steven DeFord |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |