Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Is Dynamic WEP Secure Enough? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:30:03 -0500 |
I second what John Pettitt noted: "Suggestion: forget WEP - get a good ipsec based vpn system, put the access points on a DMZ lan and require use of the VPN client to get access to anything other than a "help page" web server." I would still use WEP though, would keep some folks off this wireless network you create. So segment your wireless network outside of your corporate network. The wireless network provides your users just with access to your Citrix farm (if one exists) or VPN server. The wireless clients have to run your VPN client to fully get into the network. Somebody that takes the time to gather enough packets from your network to crack your WEP (before it changes) will only get access to the same boxes you make publicly available anyway, your VPN and/or thin client systems (Citrix). STEVE ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Smith" <like2hax@hotmail.com> To: <security-basics@securityfocus.com> Sent: Saturday, March 19, 2005 3:27 PM Subject: Is Dynamic WEP Secure Enough? Hi I am responsible for a large wireless infrastructure upgrade. Right now my plan is use PEAP w MSCHAP v2 with dynamic WEP crypto for my corporate SSID (I have others with much lower security requirements). I cannot easily go to WPA without ditching all my current devices that do not support it (good luck getting that past the CFO). We have a lot of physical security and surveillance with very tight controls, my primary area of concern would be people like myself sitting in the parking lot. Due to one of our applications, we will be sending a clear strong signal to the parking lot. Is this enough security and encryption to significantly slow intrusion attempts? Between direction finding capabilities of the Access Points and our roaming guards it would be a matter of time before we detected them. Thanks Rocko _________________________________________________________________ Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Admin Rights required on Terminal Services, sf_mail_sbm |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Any remote client - without fixed IP, Bob Beck |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Is Dynamic WEP Secure Enough?, David Gillett |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Is Dynamic WEP Secure Enough?, Jon Smith |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |