Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Admin Rights required on Terminal Services |
|---|---|
| Date: | 22 Mar 2005 11:21:18 -0000 |
In-Reply-To: <423F47FF.6040304@ucw.com.au>
From: Security <security@ucw.com.au>
With the TS config for a custom writen prog, if you cannot give admin rights to everyone (fair enough), one thing you could do is start security "failure" auditing for everything on the TS box.
Somthing similar was proposed in a previous post, will try to do this (if time permits ;) However does not seem to be a 'clean' and 'professional' way to make this thing work
Or, Why not give admin access to users and use group policy to remove any icons or access paths to any sensitive areas.
This is what we have decided to do in the meantime, give user admin rights, and restrict 'all' his access, at least accesses that he won't need: remove command prompt, control panel, disable right-click, remove access to local disk (will be moving to a thin client environment), all everything else available in the Group Policy
I am very interested in the outcome of this thread. Please continue to post ideas.
Me too! Yeah please post new ideas
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Is Dynamic WEP Secure Enough?, Vladamir |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: new workstation build quarantine, H Carvey |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Admin Rights required on Terminal Services, Security |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Admin Rights required on Terminal Services, sf_mail_sbm |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |