Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: GFI LanGuard patch-management ... does not work !? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 28 Dec 2004 08:48:20 -0800 |
Technically, these are false NEGATIVES. But Windows does also have a problem with false positives: patches that report as installed, even though they won't actually take effect until the box is rebooted (and perhaps sometimes not even then). David Gillett
-----Original Message----- From: Matt Byrne [mailto:matt.byrne@ntlworld.com] Sent: Thursday, December 23, 2004 5:53 AM To: security-basics@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: GFI LanGuard patch-management ... does not work !? Hamid, I believe it is something to do with the way Windows handles patch installation information. Some patches on some MS operating systems always come up as missing even when installed multiple times (good examples being MS 03-023 and MS 03-011) this is not just a GFI issue even MS own tool MBSA reports these false positives, and generally they are the same patches. I have heard that MS are re-engineering the way patches are recorded in the OS to eliminate these false positives; the sooner the better! Regards, Matt. -----Original Message----- From: Hamid . K [mailto:elite_netbios@yahoo.com] Sent: 07 December 2004 06:03 To: security-basics@securityfocus.com Subject: GFI LanGuard patch-management ... does not work !? Hi Here in our domain , as a beta solution I tried GFI-Security scanner and it`s remote patch installation feature . well , seems it`s just a demo ! and what does "demo" means ? my first scan resault was cool . it detected some missing patches , I downloaded them to it`s repository and finally I deployed them . But on next schedule , I got samething ! scan resault told me same things as first scan/deployment and seems non of those patched are not going to be identified/installed . the proccess seems to be working , like transfering patches and installation . all seems ok but why GFI detect them as missing patches again !? I tried all possible ways to deploy ..forcing reboot , unattended deployments , skipping user notifications and etc. any idea , why it does not work fine ? regards H,K __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The all-new My Yahoo! - Get yours free! http://my.yahoo.com
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | bridge detection, G.P.M |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Fedora 3 Wireless Promiscuous (Monitor) Mode, TStark |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: GFI LanGuard patch-management ... does not work !?, Matt Byrne |
| Next by Thread: | w32.donk.s, Calvin . Walker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |