Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Security-Basics
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Electronic signatures and watermarking?

Subject: Re: Electronic signatures and watermarking?
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:35:25 -0400 (EDT)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Wed, 27 Oct 2004, GuidoZ wrote:

Depending on how technical and secure you're looking for, I'd say do some poking around the bank/check industry. After all, they are quite concerned with fraudulent documents getting around.

I forget the exact website but there is an entire site based on a secure paper and printing/signing. Some Googling will probably reveal it. Once again, depending on your exact worries and concerns, using special paper might be overkill. However, I'll betcha the bank industry (along with check books and such) will lead to a wealth of information.
===================

<RANT>

i'm not impressed with banking technology when it comes to paper, and much less impressed now that CHECK21 is being implemented.

banks have something that the rest of us don't: the rule and force of law. aside from the usual laws that protect all of us against fraud, banks are protected by special laws and special branches of law enforcement. when it comes down to it, that may be a bigger deterrent against fraud than what kind of ink or paper they're using.

from a security perspective, CHECK21 is a joke. i'm looking forward to the first case where CHECK21 evidence is thrown out of court because it amounts to hearsay, not physical evidence... and there's no chain of custody.

</RANT>

really, if you want to have a digital signature on a piece of paper, the only practical way i can think of is to scan it into a file and sign the file. verification could then become a tedious process of comparing the actual paper to the signed file, but it can be done. you still have to be aware of other factors, such as who has access to the keys, etc.


- -- ...atom


 _________________________________________
 PGP key - http://atom.smasher.org/pgp.txt
 762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
 -------------------------------------------------

        "In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth
         is a revolutionary act."
                -- George Orwell
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: What is this gibberish?
Comment: http://atom.smasher.org/links/#digital_signatures

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJBgTvyAAoJEAx/d+cTpVciyFYH/jI5mAAncE/RbM+KFLMioVlR
WwI9FEeV92deZSLSrd0DYKNTrefTTepjJVO6aVwUlyLUomvaRfwRK/3Kb3vXUegQ
ZRVr3XlePOyO0DG14IKzkExttYAHoMpdp6F0lDHnKPVlcscybzJltYpbzZfXTulB
+7g/XXMbsJdwto1eWHNSptq8JhBicFvFkYTBG/gYzLLxEZSZjwrPyTwyCq7AAyS5
rHU6IEjiFEhfTKHLiUQ8Mgfi/YiYvowYJVfzMAfIpuzUNzhfMO27Kx9BCfL9i4jO
owe3Dmul6Na/g/tJOCOLuwJ67c9eE3B5Fno6CqHJbi9dE8+NpwRmtAZUuNl6ygw=
=sWg5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>