Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned'; Re: |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 8 Oct 2004 01:39:04 -0500 |
:) Java... dunno how much better that is than WSH, other than the fact it's multi-platform, at least... :))) *duck*
Yeah, I'd recommend ducking... that could fuel some flames. =) I'm open to other ideas too from anyone - the situation in a nutshell is an orgranization I support needs to migrate away from IE. (The users really can't handle the spyware and such, no matter how hard I try to educate and prevent.) The only thing holding them back from switching is a proprietary ActiveX application that they use to interface with their data warehouse. Changing companies isn't a possibility. I've complained at them before for offering an IE only solution (there are a few Linux systems as well which results to using WINE; though unstable). They've always argued that it works... however with the recent onslaught on IE vulnerabilities and complaints from OTHER netadmins, they are changing their toon finally. They are currently working on a java interface instead. The WSH option was also on their minds, although I pointed out this limits to Windows again... and isn't that much better. Thoughts? Java will at least be cross platform and cross browser, which is really all I'm after. However, I'm sure it has it's drawbacks, though I'm not a java programmer so I don't know what they might be off-hand. Lookign for ideas from the group. =) -- Peace. ~G On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 00:38:42 -0400, Glenn Sieb <ges@wingfoot.org> wrote:
GuidoZ said the following on 10/7/2004 2:26 AM:=D I think I already posted my replies, so I'll save doing it a 2nd time. lol Thanks for bringing it here too.:) I saw you doing it and figured I'd bring it back over too... :)Followup on your WSH idea: They are looking into it. Actually, me bringing up my dislike as ActiveX being the only thing holding back from going IE-Free was just enough to have them look at it again. They are looking into using java instead of ActiveX. (!!!! yay !!!!)WSH isn't perfect, but it's at least less-evil than ActiveX.Now all I'm doing is waiting to see what they come up with. The WSH isn't completely dead, although they admitted that it would most likely be written for IE too. The java applet they create instead would be cross platform AND cross browser. Thanks for the push to get on them again!! I think it might work this time.:) Java... dunno how much better that is than WSH, other than the fact it's multi-platform, at least... :))) *duck* Best, G. -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." ~Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
| Previous by Date: | RE: MAC level authentication or filtering, Kurt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Client End Firewalls, GuidoZ |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned'; Re:, Glenn Sieb |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Windows 98 box is 'owned'; Re:, xyberpix |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |