To me I've always had great success with LC4 and John, it all depends
what platform I'm on at the time though, and what dictionary lists I
have loaded at the time as well, so far I haven't found a passwd that I
haven't been able to crack, yet!
xyberpix
On Sat, 2004-09-11 at 13:56, Simon Taplin wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
As a matter of interest, which is better for cracking Windows password
files? LC4, LC5 or John? Do any one of these do a better job with say
dictionary attacks versuses attacks on strong passwords?
Simon
Prasanna M wrote:
| just what are LC & John? (am new to security domain, sry) :-D
| Prasanna
|
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Simon Zuckerbraun
|
| Sent: 9/5/2004 8:34 AM
| Subject: RE: Password Cracking
|
| If I understand correctly, LC is capable of doing what you're asking.
|
| Simon
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBQvXx2tzE/ERi2VURAqoZAJ4wjO6A6OvnLacT7mUYKATNaMrXSACbBxUn
OJxAEwj1bwGRwfZwlvNoTC4=
=aMXT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Forensics Training at the InfoSec Institute. All of our class sizes
are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one
interaction with one of our expert instructors. Gain the in-demand skills of
a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by
fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer
crime and abuse so that it never happens again.
http://www.infosecinstitute.com/courses/computer_forensics_training.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
For Security and Open Source news:
http://xyberpix.demon.co.uk
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
