Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Secure-Shell
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: FW: SSH/SFTP rc problem in Solaris.

Subject: RE: FW: SSH/SFTP rc problem in Solaris.
Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 08:22:09 +0200
Hi Patrick,

When I do the test on a RedHat, I get a rc 1 !.

[donypie@linprd03 ~]$ cat a.sftp
get tuut.test

[donypie@linprd03 ~]$ sftp -b a.sftp localhost
donypie@localhost's password:
sftp> get tuut.test
Couldn't stat remote file: No such file or directory
File "/home/donypie/tuut.test" not found.
[donypie@linprd03 ~]$ echo $?
1
[donypie@linprd03 ~]$


But I have received news from Sun concerning this problem and they said
that : 

Openssh sftp has changed in release 3.6p1, and *this* is why we are 
seeing different behaviour e.g. on a Linux distribution which bundles
a sufficiently recent OpenSSH suite.

These newer sftp binaries will indeed exit with a nonzero status when 
one of the batched subcommands did not succeed as requested, and of 
course they will still do so when they encounter a protocol-level error.


I hope they will implement these new features in SSH Sun as soon as
possible.


Thanks everybody.
Pierre.


-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Morris [mailto:pmorris@hermesinfotech.com] 
Sent: vendredi 5 mai 2006 21:27
To: secureshell@securityfocus.com
Subject: RE: FW: SSH/SFTP rc problem in Solaris.

Just tried this on a Red Hat box (EL4).  I get a return code of 0 for
the same commands. 

We have a SSH return code problem when we use SSH in batch in
Solaris.
We haven't this problem on RedHat. 

bash-2.05$ cat a.sftp
ls -l
pwd
get b.txt
ls -l
bash-2.05$ sftp -b a.sftp scnsys11
Connecting to scnsys11...
Password: 
sftp> ls -l
drwxr-xr-x    0 9108     10            512 Apr 21 11:15 .
drwxr-xr-x    0 0        1             512 Apr  3 14:23 ..
-rw-------    0 9108     10           2387 Apr 21 11:18
..bash_history
-rw-------    0 9108     10            240 Mar 28 16:19 .sh_history
drwx------    0 9108     10            512 Mar 22 17:11 .ssh
drwx------    0 9108     10            512 Mar 22 16:00 .ssh2
-rwxrwxrwx    0 9108     10             26 Mar 29 15:22 a.sftp
-rwxrwxrwx    0 9108     10              0 Mar 28 15:28 a.txt
-rw-------    0 9108     10        1021424 Mar 22 17:07 core
sftp> pwd
Remote working directory: /export/home/huysego
sftp> get b.txt
Couldn't stat remote file: No such file or directory File 
"/export/home/huysego/b.txt" not found.
sftp> ls -l
drwxr-xr-x    0 9108     10            512 Apr 21 11:15 .
drwxr-xr-x    0 0        1             512 Apr  3 14:23 ..
-rw-------    0 9108     10           2387 Apr 21 11:18
..bash_history
-rw-------    0 9108     10            240 Mar 28 16:19 .sh_history
drwx------    0 9108     10            512 Mar 22 17:11 .ssh
drwx------    0 9108     10            512 Mar 22 16:00 .ssh2
-rwxrwxrwx    0 9108     10             26 Mar 29 15:22 a.sftp
-rwxrwxrwx    0 9108     10              0 Mar 28 15:28 a.txt
-rw-------    0 9108     10        1021424 Mar 22 17:07 core
sftp> 
bash-2.05$ echo $?
0

************************************************************************
********************************************************************
** As you can see in this example, sftp gives a rc = 0. If you try 
the
same
on RedHat, you will receive a rc not equal to 0.



-----------------------------------------
Visit our website! http://www.nbb.be

"DISCLAIMER: The content of this e-mail message should not be
construed as binding on the part of the National Bank of Belgium
(NBB) unless otherwise and previously stated. The opinions
expressed in this message are solely those of the author and do not
necessarily reflect NBB viewpoints, particularly when the content
of this message, or part thereof, is private by nature or does not
fall within the professional scope of its author."


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>