Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Two minor requests to all participants |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sun, 28 Nov 2004 10:31:10 +0900 |
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:20:19PM +0200, Alexander Klimov wrote:
Hi. On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, Atro Tossavainen wrote:First of all, would everybody please post from a valid address.Probably it is for some other list, but is not it impossible to send from the address which is not subscribed?
Even when that is the case, this doesn't stop you from subscribing to lists from two addresses. If you can ask the list not to send you mail (many lists offer this for vacation times, or because people want to be able to post from multiple addresses without receiving multiple copies of the messages), then your posting address needs only to be valid when you subscribe. If you operate your own mail server, or can arrange it in other ways, you can subscribe from the address you want to use for posting, and then delete (or otherwise invalidate) that address on your server. This is a very effective way of dealing with spam, which often comes from people who harvest addresses from popular mailing lists (such as this one). I use this technique myself, though not on this particular list. I understand the author's sentiment, but I think it's not up to him to decide whether posters want to be reachable by the public at large (or spammers). That's up to each user to decide for themselves.
Also, if somebody feels it is necessary to operate autoresponders of any kind, would they please make sure the autoresponder won't reply to messages from mailing lists.I agree that it is better if people turn off vocation and similiar but probably it is unrealistic to expect this. Fortunately, there is simple work around: create a temporary address, subscribe it to the list and use it for the list exclusively so that everything you got which does not belong to the list (check List-Id or List-Post) can be safely forwarded to /dev/null (this include autoreplies as well as spam).
And also includes private replies... The effect is no different than what I described above. Where possible, my method is slightly better, because it prevents the mail from being delivered at all, saving bandwidth and computing time. Not all lists allow for this, however. -- Derek D. Martin http://www.pizzashack.org/ GPG Key ID: 0x81CFE75D
pgpXPNk3F6t89.pgp
Description: PGP signature
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Pubkey, Alexander Klimov |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Pubkey, Alexander Klimov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Two minor requests to all participants, Alexander Klimov |
| Next by Thread: | agent checking problem - any help would be fantastic!, john huss |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |