Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Microsoft Writing Secure Code |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 7 Jan 2005 07:38:08 +0200 |
Hi Lawrence Please explain what you mean with "...Given option 3 we know we can't trust the authentication routine.." I am not understanding what you mean with this. Regards Anton -----Original Message----- From: Lawrence Landauer (SECURITY) [mailto:lawrenl@exchange.microsoft.com] Sent: 06 January 2005 09:05 To: priestmaster; Damhuis Anton Subject: RE: Microsoft Writing Secure Code None of the three options is secure. Given option 3 we know we can't trust the authentication routine. Given that: Option 1 gives the admin info to anonymous or invalid users, Options 2 and 3 both let an attacker brute force valid usernames? - L -----Original Message----- From: priestmaster [mailto:priest@priestmaster.org] Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 8:16 AM To: Damhuis Anton Cc: secprog@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: Microsoft Writing Secure Code Hi, The third is the most secure I think. If you know how exploitation of vulnerabillites work, you can secure it easily. You need much security knowledge to create complex and secure software. Security experts also make mistakes and create security-releated bugs. No one is perfect. greets, priestmaster ----- Original Message ----- From: "Damhuis Anton" <DamhuisA@aforbes.co.za> To: <secprog@securityfocus.com> Cc: "Michael Howard" <mikehow@microsoft.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 10:52 AM Subject: RE: Microsoft Writing Secure Code I have read the book "Designing Secure Web-based Applications", found it quite informative but also somewhat disappointing. I was (at the time) looking for a book that assists with "writing secure code". Thus how code should be written, not the way code interfaces with security components. Example: What is the best way to display User Details: ~~Suedo code Begin ~~ Option 1: If var_userLevel = USER then ... display User info else ... Display Admin Info end if Option 2: If var_userLevel = ADMIN then ... display Admin info else ... Display User Info Info end if Option 3: If var_userLevel = ADMIN then ... display Admin info elseif var_userLevel = USER ... Display User Info Info else ... Capture Error end if ~~Suedo code End~~ To me it is Option 3. Somewhat more work, but a lot more secure, then Option 1. If for some reason someone else writes the code to get the variable for var_userLevel , and that code is hackable, Option 3 will withstand the attack a lot better then Option 1. Option 2 in this case would also be better then Option 1, as Option 1 would display the Admin info for anybody other then user. Option 2 in this case would revert back to the lower level of access. Thus just structuring the If stament differently in Option 1 and 2, already makes the code more secure. Also by logging all the errors in option 3's last "Else" statement one can look for any thing overlooked initially (and capture any unknown hacker attacks -although this is reactively) Regards Anton Confidentiality Warning ======================= The contents of this e-mail and any accompanying documentation are confidential and any use thereof, in what ever form, by anyone other than the addressee is strictly prohibited. Confidentiality Warning ======================= The contents of this e-mail and any accompanying documentation are confidential and any use thereof, in what ever form, by anyone other than the addressee is strictly prohibited.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Microsoft Writing Secure Code, priestmaster |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Microsoft Writing Secure Code, George Capehart |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Microsoft Writing Secure Code, Ton Geurts |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Microsoft Writing Secure Code, Damhuis Anton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |