Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Account Lockouts |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 03 Dec 2004 14:07:37 -0500 |
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 10:02:33 +1100, Michael Silk said:
Not quite sure what you mean here - obviously for each attempt at login the captcha image supplied would be different ... such that if they were to attempt to brute force (or just lock-out) 15,000 accounts that 15,000 images * a subsantial amount.
Well, there *is* some up-front work needed - but the attacker's *liveware* workload is about the same whether they need just 10 captchas broken, or 15K, or a million. The crucial point is that the linear-scaling part (getting each new "mark" to do the work for you) is both automatable and well understood.
Finding this many users - and finding such an amount to respond in a timely manner - would surely not be trivial.
Send out some spam with 'FREE PORN' - you'll get 15K takers easy enough. Lots of spammers are getting rich running a spam and collecting the victims in the 12-36 hours before their access gets yanked on *that* account or domain, and then move to the next. "Timely manner" is a well-understood problem. And it's not a problem to do it "timely" - For each captcha you want solved, you wait till one of your Joe Sixpacks clicks on the link for free porn on your website (which can easily be on some zombied box on a cablemodem somewhere), and when he connects, you then call the target site and get the captcha, hand it to Joe Sixpack, wait for his response, and send it to the target site. Oh, and you don't even need any actual porn - just dump the dupe after he's done your work for you.. ;)
Sure .. but how would you solve this issue, then, if you were truly concerned about someone targetting your site specifically to lock out all the accounts ?
Think Outside The Box. An attack designed to lock out all the accounts is only a problem if you've designed your system such that accounts can be locked out, and that it causes an actual problem when they're locked out. If you don't lock them out, or it doesn't cause a major problem when you do lock them out, the attack can't evolve from "aggrivating" into "crippling". Possible countermeasures: 1) Don't lock accounts out. (Think about it - why are you locking accounts at all? What does this do that simply time-limiting the account to one logon attempt per minute doesn't do?) 2) Design your web application to know what the lockout limits are, and refuse requests that would result in a lockout. If it takes 5 attempts per 10 minutes to lockout, and the web application refuses to issue more than 3 every 10 minutes, you don't have a lockout problem. 3) Lock accounts, but only for an hour or so. This is still annoying, but at least then you don't have to have the sysadmin resetting 15K accounts...
pgpi7rFcLQyi4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Account Lockouts, Jason Coombs |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Account Lockouts, Mark Burnett |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Account Lockouts, Michael Silk |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Account Lockouts, Mark Burnett |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |