Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Charging customers on security |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 29 Sep 2004 09:25:59 -0500 |
Let me try to sum up...please correct me if I am wrong. "We want to charge the customer for delivering secure code." If that, in fact, is a valid summation, then I think your organization is completely off base. Saying you want to charge for security is analogous to charging for functionality. Of course your customers have a right to functional, secure code. In what environment would they not? If it is going to take X additional FTEs to deliver secure code and you need to push out a delivery date, that's one thing...but to then say to your customer "OH! You wanted 'secure' code? Well, that's going to cost you an additional X thousand dollars." is just plain wrong. What are you going to do, offer two versions of your software? I can see it now: "Brand X Solutions Suite, Secure, $175,000" or for our budget conscious clients "Brand X Solutions Suite, We Didn't Care When We Wrote It, $100,000" Great business model...good luck. Bart Lansing Manager, Desktop Services/Lotus Notes/Incident Response Kohl's IT King Pang <kingpang@gmail.com> wrote on 09/23/2004 12:16:40 PM:
Hello, Our company developers Microsoft Solutions and I am responsible for leading the security initiative in the corporation. I have spent a lot of time and effort on how we should apply security guidance to our product life cycle, such as adding threat modeling and doing security review. But after I have convinced them that security is important, we brought up a discussion on how we should charge our customers. Many of you have customer experience. They want to pay the minimum and have all the features. If they can choose not to pay, they won't. If we tell them threat modeling will add x human-weeks of development and we have to charge them x thousand dollars more, they won't pay. Moreover, they expect the system to be secure enough and if there is anything wrong, they would think that is our fault. If any of you have any experience on dealing security with customers and how you would deal with this issue, please throw in two cents. Any comments or related articles would help too. Warm Regards.
| Previous by Date: | Looking for mixed Unix/Windows secure coding course, Hollis via Rubicon Recluse |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Charging customers on security, Andreas KrÃgersen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Charging customers on security, Thor |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Charging customers on security, Mitchell Hume |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |