Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Charging customers on security |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:24:04 -0700 |
Customers get what they're willing to pay for. If I charge for the additional cost of producing a secure and working product, and my competitor sells an insecure and buggy product, and does so for less than what I charge because they have lower development costs, then a customer can purchase whichever product they like. Grandstanding about which is the proper or ethical strategy does not alter the economics a whit. -- Michael Wojcik Principal Software Systems Developer, Micro Focus
-----Original Message----- From: ovi [mailto:marioara.alexandru@tin.it] Sent: Monday, 27 September, 2004 09:57 To: secprog@securityfocus.com Subject: Re: Charging customers on security It's ridiculous. What are you saying ?? If I as a client, don't pay you for having a stable and secure program you sell me a buggy one???? Not even M$ is thinking this way anymore, although they continue to sell buggy OS. On Sunday 26 September 2004 22:40, wirepair wrote:Charging for security of your own applications? That seemspretty backwardsto me. Why should the client who buys your software withthe expectationthat it works and is secure have to pay for the fact thatit isn't? So whenmy seat belts are broken, and my tires randomly explode, Ihave to pay thecar manufacturer more money to get these features fixed? duh? -wire On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:16:40 -0700 King Pang <kingpang@gmail.com> wrote:Hello, Our company developers Microsoft Solutions and I amresponsible forleading the security initiative in the corporation. Ihave spent alot of time and effort on how we should apply securityguidance to ourproduct life cycle, such as adding threat modeling anddoing securityreview. But after I have convinced them that security isimportant,we brought up a discussion on how we should charge our customers. Many of you have customer experience. They want to paythe minimumand have all the features. If they can choose not topay, they won't.If we tell them threat modeling will add x human-weeks ofdevelopmentand we have to charge them x thousand dollars more, theywon't pay.Moreover, they expect the system to be secure enough andif there isanything wrong, they would think that is our fault. If any of you have any experience on dealing securitywith customersand how you would deal with this issue, please throw intwo cents. Anycomments or related articles would help too. Warm Regards.-- Visit Things From Another World for the best comics, movies, toys, collectibles and more. http://www.tfaw.com/?qt=wmf
| Previous by Date: | RE: Charging customers on security, Stan Guzik |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Charging customers on security, Adam Shostack |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Charging customers on security, Stan Guzik |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Charging customers on security, Cory Foy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |