Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Port 5357 -- Vista SP1 ??? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sat, 26 Jul 2008 08:13:34 +0200 |
A more detailed page on the feature: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb756908.aspx Cordialement, Mathieu CHATEAU french blog: http://www.lotp.fr english blog: http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com -----Message d'origine----- De : listbounce@securityfocus.com [mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com] De la part de jond Envoyé : mardi 22 juillet 2008 22:02 À : pen-test@securityfocus.com Objet : Port 5357 -- Vista SP1 ??? I have a homemade tripwire type program that alerted me to someone connecting to port 5357 on my Vista SP1 box. To my knowledge, I don't think I have this port open.
From a little time on google, it looks like some people are calling
this a potential info leak problem. I'm curious if anyone is going as far as to manually block the port, and if so, if there are any negative consequences? In my opinion, if this is some sort of default vista webserver that the firewall doesn't touch, it's but a matter of time..... If I run 'netstat -anb | find "5357"' it doesn't give the owning process, it says: "x: Windows Sockets initialization failed: 5 TCP 0.0.0.0:5357 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING TCP [::]:5357 [::]:0 LISTENING" I tried hitting the port on another Vista computer and it looks like it's some sort of built in webserver???? This is the response: "C:\>nc 10.10.12.90 5357 ? HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Server: Microsoft-HTTPAPI/2.0 Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:37:41 GMT Connection: close Content-Length: 326 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN""http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/str ict.dtd"> <HTML><HEAD><TITLE>Bad Request</TITLE> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" Content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"></HEAD> <BODY><h2>Bad Request - Invalid Verb</h2> <hr><p>HTTP Error 400. The request verb is invalid.</p> </BODY></HTML> C:\>" If I try to hit the port with firefox, since it looks like a webserver, I get this: "HTTP Error 503. The service is unavailable." Very different from hitting a port that's blocked..... I'm curious what everyone else thinks. Jon . . ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Cenzic Top 5 Common Mistakes in Securing Web Applications Get 45 Min Video and PPT Slides www.cenzic.com/landing/securityfocus/hackinar ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Cenzic Top 5 Common Mistakes in Securing Web Applications Get 45 Min Video and PPT Slides www.cenzic.com/landing/securityfocus/hackinar ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: port 18302, à aditya mukadam à |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Malicious Mozilla/Firefox/Thunderbird/Etc Extension, Alexandru Burciu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Port 5357 -- Vista SP1 ???, Terry Cutler |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Port 5357 -- Vista SP1 ???, Colin Copley |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |