Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Faxing and PCI DSS compliance |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:56:12 -0500 |
On Jan 24, 2008 3:15 PM, jw <rx.jeff@yahoo.com> wrote:
Well, let me be more specific. Let's say your company utilizes another company's service where you can receive faxes via email in the form of PDF sent to you. So let's say your customer faxes you full 16 digit cc# with expiration on their regular fax machine. What is your company's PCI liability on this as that fax, with cc info gets to you in the following manner: customer fax cc# --> 3rd party fax service --> to your company in PDF via email So in essence, should your company be liable for non-compliance even though this is not something you can control?
The requirement 3 is about "sending" PAN and not about receiving. Your responsibility would be to abide by all PCI requirements unless you destroy the e-mails according to the PCI DSS requirements (i.e., military wiping stuff).
cwright@bdosyd.com.au wrote: JW, Your first problem will stem from having to encrypt the numbers in transit. The fax to email gateway will have to sign these emails. A set of competating controls could be implemented for this (protected network with firewalls, IDS etc which could take the place of encrption, but this would be a significant investment in itself. The PCI-DSS requirement 3 states "not sending PAN in unencrypted e-mails". 4.2 also specifically states "4.2 Never send unencrypted PANs by e-mail". So as I said, there are possible compensating controls, but I believe that they are going to be far more of an investment then encryption. Next in this case the fax server and email system would have to be on a firewalled segment and not (as is common) on the same network as all the users. With physical faxes, 9.6 applies "Physically secure all paper and electronic media (including computers, electronic media, networking and communications hardware, telecommunication lines, paper receipts, paper reports, and faxes) that contain cardholder data." You would have to have a minimum level of security on the virtualised process as for paper handling. So this would cover (as with the above) encryption, destruction after use etc.
These things are required if at all you store the CC data. You cannot control the actions of others who decide to send you their CC numbers. Your responsibility is to handle the data responsibility. Hope it helps, Rajat. -- Rajat Swarup http://rajatswarup.blogspot.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps NOW? Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast. Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today! http://www.cenzic.com/downloads ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Oracle password cracker, Ti |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: ESX Vmware Physically connected to different segments, Dave Howe |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Faxing and PCI DSS compliance, Dennis Opacki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Faxing and PCI DSS compliance, David M. Zendzian |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |