Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Question re: load balancers as a security device |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:24:51 -0500 |
Load balancers do not provide any type of security. Load balancers will only distribute the traffic and not deny it. If your ISP manages all the security devices between you and the hosting facility then at a minimum you will want to put an additional firewall on your side so you can have some control of what accesses your network over this site to site tunnel. This will probably be easier (politically not technically) in a lager company. Kevin On 22 Jan 2008 15:05:28 -0000, <dan.tesch@comcast.net> wrote:
I'm new to a company that has a large number of sites parked on managed servers at a hosting facility - the servers, firewalls and load balancers are exclusive to our use but managed by the ISP. In reviewing our site design I have seen that the VPN between our LAN and the hosting facility permits all IP traffic in both directions - effectively making these public facing servers part of our LAN in my opinion. For obvious reasons I'm looking to change this. Nobody is lobbying against the change but a senior developer that was involved in the original design points out that because of the load balancers in front of the servers, the world at large is not able to touch the machines and thus the potential for compromise is limited. Could I get some comments from this community about how vulnerable or not this type of setup might be? I'm looking for specific info related to the load balancers not commentary about the corporate LAN in this situation - even if the combination of the firewalls and load balancers provide 99.9% protection I think it is a bad idea and would most likely not pass PCI scrutiny. Thanks ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps NOW? Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast. Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today! http://www.cenzic.com/downloads ------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps NOW? Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast. Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today! http://www.cenzic.com/downloads ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Oracle URL SQL Injection issue, Joxean Koret |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Promiscuous mode doesn't work on Intel 3945 wireless, Israel Ochoa |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Question re: load balancers as a security device, Justin Ferguson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Question re: load balancers as a security device, Marcos Pitanga |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |