Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Question re: load balancers as a security device |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:31:44 -0800 (PST) |
-Sounds like employees at the ISP have access to those servers, and by extension, could get into your network. -Many ISPs have "service" networks for backups and management - what if a server on the same backup segment has a virus and infects your machine and then jumps into your corporate address space? -Unless the load balancers are doing some sort of filtering, it seems that the machines are being touched -- The load balancers basically deciding WHICH machine will be accessed, and pass everything, such as through the injection attempts, to the web server behind it.... ----- Original Message ----
From: "dan.tesch@comcast.net" <dan.tesch@comcast.net> To: pen-test@securityfocus.com Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:05:28 AM Subject: Question re: load balancers as a security device I'm new to a company that has a large number of sites parked on managed
servers at a hosting facility - the servers, firewalls and
load
balancers are exclusive to our use but managed by the ISP.
In reviewing our site design I have seen that the VPN between our LAN
and the hosting facility permits all IP traffic in both directions
-
effectively making these public facing servers part of our LAN in
my
opinion.
For obvious reasons I'm looking to change this. Nobody is lobbying
against the change but a senior developer that was involved in
the
original design points out that because of the load balancers in front of
the
servers, the world at large is not able to touch the machines and
thus
the potential for compromise is limited.
Could I get some comments from this community about how vulnerable or
not this type of setup might be? I'm looking for specific info
related
to the load balancers not commentary about the corporate LAN in
this
situation - even if the combination of the firewalls and load
balancers
provide 99.9% protection I think it is a bad idea and would most
likely
not pass PCI scrutiny.
Thanks ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps NOW? Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast. Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today! http://www.cenzic.com/downloads ------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps NOW? Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast. Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today! http://www.cenzic.com/downloads ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Question re: load balancers as a security device, Justin Ferguson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Oracle URL SQL Injection issue, Joxean Koret |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Question re: load balancers as a security device, Dotzero |
| Next by Thread: | Ultra VNC-3DES-is it secure, pentestr |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |