Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Pen-Test
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Question re: load balancers as a security device

Subject: Re: Question re: load balancers as a security device
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:56:14 -0800
The answer is, it depends. It depends on the network design and the technology 
used by the load balancer. For example, a round-robin DNS load balancer offers 
no security. Sure, one could argue that since you don't expose the host via a 
public IP address there is no risk. That's not the case. You might want to read:

http://www.networkcomputing.com/1102/1102ws1.html

or if you are a MS shop:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=A101CA7D-6FCD-44BF-8BE1-47F1462DCB24&displaylang=en
http://207.46.196.114/WindowsServer/en/Library/fa6ef832-1aa7-472f-b492-0dd3c60bd46d1033.mspx

----------
---Matthew
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 1/22/2008 at 3:05 PM dan.tesch@comcast.net wrote:

I'm new to a company that has a large number of sites parked on managed
servers at a hosting facility - the servers, firewalls and load balancers
are exclusive to our use but managed by the ISP.

In reviewing our site design I have seen that the VPN between our LAN and
the hosting facility permits all IP traffic in both directions -
effectively making these public facing servers part of our LAN in my
opinion.

For obvious reasons I'm looking to change this.  Nobody is lobbying
against the change but a senior developer that was involved in the
original design points out that because of the load balancers in front of
the servers, the world at large is not able to touch the machines and thus
the potential for compromise is limited.

Could I get some comments from this community about how vulnerable or not
this type of setup might be? I'm looking for specific info related to the
load balancers not commentary about the corporate LAN in this situation -
even if the combination of the firewalls and load balancers provide 99.9%
protection I think it is a bad idea and would most likely not pass PCI
scrutiny.

Thanks

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Cenzic

Need to secure your web apps NOW?
Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast.
Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today!

http://www.cenzic.com/downloads
------------------------------------------------------------------------




------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Cenzic

Need to secure your web apps NOW?
Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast.
Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today!

http://www.cenzic.com/downloads
------------------------------------------------------------------------


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>