Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Pen-Test
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: RE: Re: GCIA, GSEC, GCIH, CISSP, CEH ???

Subject: RE: RE: Re: GCIA, GSEC, GCIH, CISSP, CEH ???
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:47:46 -0800
Yeah, I realized after I hit submit that I should have specified I was
referring to very early on when there was no Silver/Gold/Platinum for SANS
certifications, just a single cert level. Unless I'm confusing SANS with
another one of the old-school security certs... This is why I should avoid
posting or moderating the list after midnight. I knew our resident aussie
would chime in with a correction :P

While I'm not exactly an old-timer yet, I've been in the IT industry for
over 20 years now and it's amazing to me just how far we've come in some
respects and how some things still remain the same. Despite the maturation
of some security niches and the heightened awareness of security in general,
it's still almost as easy to penetrate systems as it was back in the early
(to me) days... only the viable vectors have changed. Sometimes I miss
remote fingerd exploits. Now get off my lawn you danged kids!


--
Erin Carroll
Moderator
SecurityFocus pen-test list
"Do Not Taunt Happy-Fun Ball" 


-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce@securityfocus.com 
[mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com] On Behalf Of 
cwright@bdosyd.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 11:53 PM
To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: RE: Re: GCIA, GSEC, GCIH, CISSP, CEH ???

Sorry Erin, but there was an error, the paper gives a Gold 
cert. Other then this I agree with you. 

Platinum is another thing with multiple Golds and then 
several days and nights of sadistic torture. Having done this 
I will state it as such. (Hi Charles: and co.:)

Other then this I do agree. I think that there needs to be a 
differntiator in the acronim. Maybe GSEC-S for silver and 
GSEC for Gold? I know that this would make it easier to get 
my staff to complete their paper submissions (they get time 
off with pay, so there is little to stop them in my 
oppinion). However, they still mostly stop at silver and I 
would have to say from the giac site that most people stop at 
silver. The odds seem to be distributed arround 1 in 6 people 
going to Gold last I checked.

OSSTMM tests are the only ones I would put on a par with 
SANS/GIAC. They are more focuced though, whereas SANS have a 
wider range. Pete's offering makes a good counterpoint to 
GIAC and if you have the money OSSTMM and GIAC Gold are a strong pair.

CISSP/is management. CEH is intro or beginner level.

Regards,
Dr Craig Wright (GSE-Compliance)

________________________________________
From: Erin Carroll [amoeba@amoebazone.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December 2007 5:23 PM
To: Craig Wright; pen-test@securityfocus.com
Subject: RE: Re: GCIA, GSEC, GCIH, CISSP, CEH ???

I rarely chime in on the certification threads but I'm going 
to have to agree with Craig here for the most part. The SANS 
tests are thorough and relatively current. However, as 
another poster pointed out, they used to be much harder to 
obtain as in the murky past there was a requirement for the 
certs for passing the test *and* publishing a whitepaper for 
peer review.
Nowadays that's a platinum level cert.

However, the majority of the more well-known certifications 
aren't exactly shabby either, it just depends on what you 
want to get out of your time.
Each have their strengths in terms of subject matter taught 
or concepts explored. Focus on the courses/certs that place 
greater importance in the "hands-on show me what you've 
learned" aspect. I haven't had the chance to try the OSSTMM 
tests from isecom but I've heard some good things about the 
work Pete et al are doing. When it comes down to it, find 
something that lights your fire and pursue it. The best 
training course or certificate in the universe isn't going to 
help you if the material bores you out of your mind and you 
don't constantly use what you've learned :)



-----Original Message-----
From: listbounce@securityfocus.com
[mailto:listbounce@securityfocus.com] On Behalf Of 
cwright@bdosyd.com.au
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 8:31 PM
To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Re: GCIA, GSEC, GCIH, CISSP, CEH ???

Hi,
My vote goes with SANS/GIAC. Take the GSE GIAC Platinum level tests 
and then you really are being tested.

Having 20 something GIAC certs and most of the major other ones, I 
think I am rather unique in being able to compare these from 
experiance.

In this, my money goes to the SANS GIAC ones.

Regards,
Dr Craig S Wright (GSE-Compliance)

--------------------------------------------------------------
----------

--------------------------------------------------------------
----------
This list is sponsored by: Cenzic

Need to secure your web apps NOW?
Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast.
Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today!

http://www.cenzic.com/downloads
--------------------------------------------------------------
----------



------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Cenzic

Need to secure your web apps NOW?
Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast.
Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today!

http://www.cenzic.com/downloads
------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>