All, I would value your opinion. I am trying to make a comparison
between the 'new kids on the block' in terms of pen tester
accreditation here in the UK, CREST and TIGERScheme, for my
organisation. So far I've come up with the following information.
CREST TIGER
An existing examination No Yes
Independent of suppliers No Yes
End user driven No Yes
Not for profit Yes? Yes
Applicable to Individuals Yes? Yes
Company standards Yes Yes (CCTM)
Career path Yes? Yes
University standard No Yes
It seems that the TIGER Scheme www.tigerscheme.org is fully up and
running and accrediting individuals already plus it is a University
based examination which CREST www.crest-approved.org is not.
I see from the CREST website that they are in support of the often
maligned multiple guess CEH examination and will 'grandfather'
individuals into the 'CREST approved' scheme if they have CEH. Now I
am a CEH [amongst other things I hasten to add] and I sat the exam in
early 2003. It was taken reasonably seriously then but it seems that
the pen test communities opinion of the cert has deprecated somewhat
over time ... so is CREST a re-branded EC-COUNCIL? If so will they go
the same way?
To grandfather into TIGER at the lowest level of certification you
need an approved MSc in Computer Security. Basically any certs I
recommend for my organisation I want to be taken seriously now and in
future. I am heavily leaning towards TIGER.
Your thoughts?
Thanks in advance.
EH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Cenzic
Need to secure your web apps NOW?
Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast.
Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today!
http://www.cenzic.com/downloads
------------------------------------------------------------------------
