Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: R: WifiZoo v1.1 |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:17:42 -0400 |
It should also be noted that this will only work if the access points you are capturing on are unencrpted (ie no WEP or WPA). Athough I dont know anything about WifiZoo I expect you could you decrypt the traffic with aircrack-ng suite (airdecap), after the psk has been recovered and then parse the unencrypted traffic. Just wanted to through this out there since you were comparing Kismet with this tool and Kismet is not used for cracking and more of an enumeration tool. Hope this helps, Kevin On 9/20/07, Hernan Ochoa <hernan@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Rissone! I don't promote using the term 'versus' between Kismet and wifizoo :) Really, WifiZoo is not trying to be kismet AT ALL, it can't, Kismet is a much more evolved tool with lots of great features :). In fact, if you go to WifiZoo's web page, you'll see that I propose using Kismet to do channel hopping :). Kismet is one of the best if not the best tool to do wardriving, wifi networks reconnaissance, etc. It has GPS support, and much much more advanced features. WifiZoo is more oriented at parsing captured data from open wifi networks, like it is said in the documentation, ala 'dsniff' and 'Ferret'. It will save information from MSN,POP3,FTP,HTTP, HTTP COOKIES etc, so you can try to obtain pop3 acconts, ftp accounts, etc etc. You can run kismet and wifizoo, and be hopping around channels capturing data from open wifi networks, or just select a channel and capture data on that channel alone, etc And I'm now adding a 'proxy' server so once you captured HTTP cookies, you can point your browser to wifizoo's proxy, and access the proper site with the captured cookies and access accounts, etc., exactly ala 'Ferret' / 'hamster' from Errata Security, they are the ones that did it first. WifiZoo also does this very basic graphs at the moment of networks founds, probe requests, that I find useful. You can have a picture of the bssids and clients around you looking at one single graph, a graph of what ssids are being probed by what sources, etc. Is nothing spectacular, but I find it interesting and it works for me. I'm a fan of graphical representations of data :). In Summary, keep using Kismet, I know I would :), and use WifiZoo if you are interesting in capturing application data to compromise pop3 accounts, web applications by reusing captured cookies, etc. And while you are at it, you can also check out 'Ferret'. And you can also not use WifiZoo at all if you don't find it useful, that's perfectly fine too of course! :), WifiZoo is not trying to replace any other tool, it just tries (TRIES :)) to bring something more to the table, that's all!. WifiZoo is work in progress,if you'd like something to be changed/added to it, let me know :) I guess the only way to figure out if you find it useful is using it :), I'm still in that process :), so far it has worked for me on certain situations. Hope this helps!. Thanks!, Hernan On 9/20/07, Rissone Ruggero <ruggero.rissone@telecomitalia.it> wrote:Could you explain me the pros vs Kismet, considered a must in WiFi pen testing ? -------------------------------------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by replying to webmaster@telecomitalia.it. Thank you www.telecomitalia.it -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This list is sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps NOW? Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast. Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today! http://www.cenzic.com/downloads ------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps NOW? Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast. Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today! http://www.cenzic.com/downloads ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Very strange nmap scan results, Juan B |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Very strange nmap scan results, Hans-J. Ullrich |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: R: WifiZoo v1.1, Hernan Ochoa |
| Next by Thread: | How to publish a new vulnerability?, vinod sharma |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |