Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Cross testing exploit with vulnerability scan results |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:50:42 +0530 |
Wood, without knowing all facts making a statement is not a sign of pen tester.. I'm here to share something with fellow testers and not to know what I am and what I am not... Nevertheless I appreciate and agree with your success story and that of Steve's... I have had similar experience... vulnerability scanners often miss configuration, authentication and authorization flaws... and a whole lot of stuff... Having said that I understand what Vulnerability Scanners do well and use them for that... and if I've come across well that is what I meant in my query... Let's take this scenario: 1. We run NMAP and find that target runs IIS6.0 (through banner grabbing and telneting) 2. We run Nessus and find that it doesn't report any holes 3. We run WebInspect and manually test for SQL Injection, XSS and similar issues Let's assume a scenario where Nessus had an issue with some NASL script and it couldn't catch a issue in this IIS6.0 ... To counter such scenarios I can think of three cases: 1. Run Retina on the target and cross check results 2. Download all possible exploits for IIS6.0 and manually test them against target (ofcourse I'll test them on my test network first) 3. Install another version of Nessus may be 2.x or 3.x on a Windows system and cross check... My query with fellow testers is is there a fourth option and what is a preferred option from 3 above and why.. THNX On 7/28/07, Morning Wood <se_cur_ity@hotmail.com> wrote:
I've been conducting pen tests since 4 yrs now... the methodology I follow is that we exploit or attempt to exploit ONLY those vulnerabilities that a vulnerability scanner identifies.your not a pentester... your a vulnerability scanner kiddi... nothing more, nothing less. Nearly 100% of my successfull pentest were from flaws not uncovered by a vuln scan, found by manual techniques. cheers! m.w
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Cenzic Need to secure your web apps NOW? Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast. Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today! http://www.cenzic.com/downloads ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Cross testing exploit with vulnerability scan results, Sol_Invictus |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Cross testing exploit with vulnerability scan results, Anders Thulin |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Cross testing exploit with vulnerability scan results, Jan Heisterkamp |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Cross testing exploit with vulnerability scan results, Christine Kronberg |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |