Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Brute-forcing cached Windows login password hashes |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:13:49 +0200 |
Cordialement, Mathieu CHATEAU http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com
The hash algorithm is a salted MD4. It's impossible (ok, to be pedantic it's mathematically infeasible) to use rainbow tables because of the salting, so that leaves you with dictionary and brute-force.
The latest version of John and the MS Cache Hash patches are all available from http://openwall.com/john/. I believe v1.7.2 is the latest version.
Regards, Carl
Ben Greenberg wrote:Greetings all,
My question is regarding the encrypted password hashes that Windows stores in
the registry of the last 10 logins to a workstation.
I read the original white paper written by Arnaud Pilon and I've used his
cachedump tool to extract the password hashes from the registry. What I'm
wondering is what type of hash those passwords use. Is it straight MD4? I
know that each hash is salted with a machine-specific unique string. What I
am unclear on is what exactly the password hash is and how it can be
brute-forced. I know that there is a patch for John the Ripper, but every
mention I can find refers to a two year old version of John. Does anyone know
if the most recent version has this patch in it already? Also, is anyone
familiar with any rainbow tables for cracking these passwords? Are rainbow
tables possible for these hashes because of the salting?
Thanks all.
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Cenzic
Need to secure your web apps NOW? Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast. Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today!
http://www.cenzic.com/downloads ------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Cenzic
Need to secure your web apps NOW? Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast. Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today!
http://www.cenzic.com/downloads ------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This list is sponsored by: Cenzic
Need to secure your web apps NOW? Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast. Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today!
http://www.cenzic.com/downloads ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Brute-forcing cached Windows login password hashes, Carl Livitt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Basic facilities required to establish a pen test lab, Gubir |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Brute-forcing cached Windows login password hashes, Carl Livitt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Brute-forcing cached Windows login password hashes, Carl Livitt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |