Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Mile2 Training (Certifications) |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 17 Jul 2007 09:08:07 +0100 |
Greetings,
There is an initiative in the UK that has lead to the creation of the Tiger
Scheme.
The TIGER Scheme provides a means of independently certifying the skills of
vulnerability test ('penetration test') engineers.
The Scheme is managed independently by a Management Committee comprised of
industry stakeholders with a vested interest in maintaining standards and in
meeting market requirements.
The three main strengths of the TIGER Scheme are: independence; a
University-based examination; and strong end-customer involvement on the
Management Committee.
http://www.tigerscheme.org.uk/
Andrew
On 16/7/07 19:46, "Pete Herzog" <lists@isecom.org> wrote:
Hi Ken, Unfortunately, skills-based certification is the closest thing that exists to what is really required, decent apprenticeships. While "virtual" apprenticeships happen through hacker groups and to some regards in certain on-line training venues, that doesn't come close to giving the well-rounded skills a professional security tester needs in the modern workplace. I was lucky enough to have a great mentor during my time at IBM and what Peter Klee didn't teach me about just knowing how to be a "smart security consultant" as he called it could fit in a thimble. For a year that guy dragged me to analyst meetings and customer meetings and presentations and internal department meetings where I just sat there with my mouth shut and learned how security professionals handle themselves. That doesn't happen these days. Kids leave college with a few infosec courses under their belt and they become security professionals already assessing other people's business. There's no substitute for proper apprenticeship. But since that won't happen much anymore we need to find other ways to prove ourselves. We do that by showing it to an independent 3rd party to rate our ability to apply knowledge and skills to realistic problems in a timely manner. And that's what ISECOM is doing. It's the closest thing you can get to proving experience and ability like in an apprenticeship. This whole thing about work experience voucher and all that is a sham that more and more people get around. That doesn't mean anything! We all work with people who share the same job title but not the same work ethic or skills. Yet after 2 years they are the same level as you according to these business experience certification requirements. It's so hokey that I even have to use the word "hokey" and that alone is upsetting! ;) Sincerely, -pete. Ken Kousky wrote:When exploring certification programs it's also important to note that ANSI/OSI have a standard for the certification of professional licensing and certification programs. The ANSI/OSI framework does not allow for this kind of approach, where you have to buy a specific training product or program. A professional licensing process should be an independent test of competencies and not a measure of the training program an individual purchases. The DoD 8570 directive endorses ANSI/OSI certified certification programs - I think for this reason. It's not buying training but establishing competencies that matters. It's what you know, not what you buy. I think mostgood professional certifications are moving in this direction. We still have a long way to go before the processional standards for competency are clearly codified. Right now, the targeted skills continue to evolve with the exploits but we're starting to better understand the need for foundation skills and then specific applications of these skills. KWK------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Swap Out your SPI or Watchfire app sec solution for Cenzic's robust, accurate risk assessment and management solution FREE - limited Time Offer http://www.cenzic.com/c/wf-spi ------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Swap Out your SPI or Watchfire app sec solution for Cenzic's robust, accurate risk assessment and management solution FREE - limited Time Offer http://www.cenzic.com/c/wf-spi ------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Previous by Date: | Re: Skype use obligation - Security x Productivity, Javier O. Augusto |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Skype use obligation - Security x Productivity, Javier Reyna Padilla |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Mile2 Training (Certifications), Pete Herzog |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Mile2 Training (Certifications), Jamie Riden |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |